php Natural Products from Arachis hypogaea | BioCrick

Natural Products from Arachis hypogaea

Natural Products Isolated from Arachis hypogaea

BioCrick provides high-purity natural products and bioactive compounds isolated and purified from natural sources for scientific research.

  • Natural product compounds selected from diverse chemical and biological sources.
  • Broad structural diversity and coverage of biological activities.
  • Product activity information can be supported by published literature, patents and research reports.
  • Natural products can be selected according to source, target, activity and disease research interests.
  • Compounds should be stored according to the product specifications after receipt.

Natural Products from Arachis hypogaea

6 natural product s associated with Arachis hypogaea

Natural products and bioactive compounds from Arachis hypogaea
Catalog No. Product Name CAS Number COA
BCN4652 5,7-Dihydroxychromone
5,7-Dihydroxychromone chemical structure
31721-94-5 COA
BCN2356 Diosmetin
Diosmetin chemical structure
520-34-3 COA
BCN1209 Eriodictyol
Eriodictyol chemical structure
552-58-9 COA
BCN6809 Procyanidin A1
Procyanidin A1 chemical structure
103883-03-0 COA
BCN6805 Procyanidin A2
Procyanidin A2 chemical structure
41743-41-3 COA
BCN5607 Resveratrol
Resveratrol chemical structure
501-36-0 COA

References

Transcriptomic analysis with the progress of symbiosis in 'crack-entry' legume Arachis hypogaea highlights its contrast with 'infection thread' adapted legumes.[Pubmed: 30109978]


In root-nodule symbiosis, rhizobial invasion and nodule organogenesis is host controlled. In most legumes, rhizobia enter through infection-threads and nodule primordium in the cortex is induced from a distance. But in dalbergoid legumes like Arachis hypogaea, rhizobia directly invade cortical cells through epidermal cracks to generate the primordia. Herein we report the transcriptional dynamics with the progress of symbiosis in A. hypogaea at 1dpi: invasion; 4dpi: nodule primordia; 8dpi: spread of infection in nodule-like structure; 12dpi: immature nodules containing rod-shaped rhizobia; and 21dpi: mature nodules with spherical symbiosomes. Expression of putative orthologue of symbiotic genes in 'crack-entry' legume A. hypogaea was compared with infection thread adapted model legumes. The contrasting features were (i) higher expression of receptors like LYR3, EPR3 as compared to canonical NFRs (ii) late induction of transcription factors like NIN, NSP2 and constitutive high expression of ERF1, EIN2, bHLH476 and (iii) induction of divergent pathogenesis responsive PR-1 genes. Additionally, symbiotic orthologues of SymCRK, ROP6, RR9, SEN1 and DNF2 were not detectable and microsynteny analysis indicated the absence of RPG homologue in diploid parental genomes of A. hypogaea. The implications are discussed and a molecular framework that guide 'crack-entry' symbiosis in A. hypogaea is proposed.


Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis Identified Gene Clusters and Candidate Genes for Oil Content in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.).[Pubmed: 30100671]


None


Peanut.[Pubmed: 30000961]


Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) contain carbohydrate, fat, and protein. Some of the proteins in peanuts are considered to be allergens that can lead to allergic reactions. Cooked, unripe peanuts are reportedly used in Africa and Asia as a galactogogue;[1] however, no scientifically valid clinical trials support this use. Galactogogues should never replace evaluation and counseling on modifiable factors that affect milk production.[2] Peanut protein allergens have been detected in breastmilk and some case reports and series have implicated maternal ingestion of peanuts during breastfeeding to peanut allergy in their breastfed infants.[3][4][5][6] Studies to determine whether maternal peanut ingestion during breastfeeding causes infant peanut allergy have come to conflicting conclusions. In the United States and United Kingdom, mothers were advised to avoid peanuts during pregnancy and breastfeeding in the late 1990s, but these recommendations have been withdrawn because of a lack of evidence of a reduction in peanut allergy.[7][8]