BIM 23056

IC50: 0.02 nM for SSTR3

Somatostatin (SRIF) is a cyclic tetradecapeptide that was originally isolated from mammalian hypothalamus and characterized as a physiological regulator of GH secretion from the anterior pituitary. BIM 23056 is a novel linear peptide of SRIF SSTR3 antagnist.

In vitro: BIM 23056 bound to SSTR3 with subnanomolar affinities. BIM 23056 displayed remarkable selectivity for SSTR3, not interacting significantly with either SSTR1 or SSTR2 at concentrations as high as 1 μM. BIM 23056 was 30,000-fold selective for SSTR3, which maks it a ligand of choice for future studies on SSTR3 [1]. In addition, it has been found that BIM 23056 behaves as a potent and surmountable antagonist at the human recombinant sst5 receptor. Such antagonism was specific for the sst5 receptor as BIM 23056 did not inhibit [Ca2+], or Ins(1,4,5)P3 increases in response to UTP [2].

In vivo: No animal in vivo data have been reported.

Clinical trial: Up to now, BIM 23056 is still in the preclinical development stage.

References:
[1] Raynor K, Murphy WA, Coy DH, Taylor JE, Moreau JP, Yasuda K, Bell GI, Reisine T.  Cloned somatostatin receptors: identification of subtype-selective peptides and demonstration of high affinity binding of linear peptides. Mol Pharmacol. 1993 Jun;43(6):838-44.
[2] Wilkinson GF, Thurlow RJ, Sellers LA, Coote JE, Feniuk W, Humphrey PP.  Potent antagonism by BIM-23056 at the human recombinant somatostatin sst5 receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 1996 Jun;118(3):445-7.

Potent antagonism by BIM-23056 at the human recombinant somatostatin sst5 receptor.[Pubmed:8762063]

Br J Pharmacol. 1996 Jun;118(3):445-7.

We have investigated the effects of somatostatin (SRIF) and the linear octapeptide BIM-23056 on changes in intracellular calcium ion concentration ([Ca2+]i) and on the formation of inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (Ins(1,4,5)P3) in CHO-K1 cells transfected with the human recombinant SRIF sst5 receptor. SRIF elicited concentration-dependent increases in [Ca2+]i, with a pEC50 of 7.02 +/- 0.06, while BIM-23056 (1 x 10(-7) M) behaved not as an agonist but as a potent, surmountable antagonist of these increases in [Ca2+]i. The SRIF concentration-effect curve for increases in [Ca2+]i was shifted rightward producing an estimated pKB for the antagonist of 8.0. BIM-23056 (1 x 10(-7) M) also significantly attenuated Ins(1,4,5)P3 increases due to SRIF, but had no effect on either basal or uridine 5'-triphosphate (UTP) (1 x 10(-4) M) stimulated increases in the levels of [Ca2+]i or Ins(1,4,5)P3.

Characterisation of human recombinant somatostatin receptors. 2. Modulation of GTPgammaS binding.[Pubmed:10598789]

Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1999 Nov;360(5):500-9.

G protein activation by somatostatin (somatotropin release inhibiting factor, SRIF), cortistatin (CST) and analogues of these neuropeptides was investigated at human somatostatin receptor subtypes 1-5 (sst1-5) stably expressed in CCL39 Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells by measuring agonist-stimulated [35S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding. [35S]GTPgammaS binding was assessed in the presence of 100 mM NaCl and 1 microM GDP, although higher Emax and/or pEC50 values may have been obtained under other conditions, but at the expense of lower absolute stimulation or signal/noise ratio. SRIF14 stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding to 162, 220, 148 and 266% of control levels via sst2, sst3, sst4 and sst5 receptors, respectively. At sst1 receptors, SRIF14 produced only a limited stimulation (Emax 115%). Hence sst1 receptors were not subjected to further [35S]GTPgammaS binding experiments. [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays were then performed with sst2-5 receptors. Most of the peptide analogues stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding in sst2-5 receptor-expressing cells. BIM 23056 behaved as an antagonist on SRIF14-induced [35S]GTPgammaS binding with an apparent pKBs of 6.33 and 5.84 at hsst3 and hsst5 receptors respectively, whereas neither agonism nor antagonism could be shown (at 1 microM) at sst2 or sst4 receptors. The effect at sst5 receptors was not surmountable and needs further investigations. The so-called "antagonist" SA, was devoid of antagonist activity at sst2 or sst3 receptors, whereas it was almost a full agonist at sst4 and sst5 receptor-mediated [35S]GTPgammaS binding. The [35S]GTPgammaS-binding profiles of hsst2-5 receptors were compared with their respective radioligand binding profiles. For sst4 and sst5 receptors, the rank order of affinity of all tested radioligands correlated highly significantly with [35S]GTPgammaS binding (r = 0.814-0.897). At sst3 receptors, [35S]GTPgammaS binding correlated somewhat less with binding profiles obtained with [125I][Tyr10]CST14 and [125I]CGP 23996 than with [125I]LTT-SRIF28 (r = 0.743, 0.757 and 0.882, respectively). At sst2 receptors, [35S]GTPgammaS binding correlated with [125I]LTT-SRIF28, [125I]CGP 23996 and [125I][Tyr3]octreotide binding profiles (r = 0.596-0.699), but not with [125I][Tyr10]CST14 binding. The present [35S]GTPgammaS binding data combined to previous radioligand binding results obtained in cells expressing human SRIF receptors, suggest that at any given receptor, agonists' rank orders of potency (not to mention absolute affinity values which vary profoundly) are not as strictly ordered as may be anticipated. We are investigating these aspects further by analysing additional signalling pathways.

Subtype selectivity of peptide analogs for all five cloned human somatostatin receptors (hsstr 1-5).[Pubmed:7988476]

Endocrinology. 1994 Dec;135(6):2814-7.

Recent reports (Raynor et al) have claimed the identification of potent somatostatin (SST) agonists exhibiting binding affinities of 1-2 pM and up to 30,000 fold binding selectivity for several of the 5 cloned sstr subtypes. These conclusions, however, are based on binding comparisons of sstr subtypes from different species expressed in different cell lines and studied with different radioligands. To eliminate the effect of species and/or methodological variations, we have investigated agonist selectivity of 32 synthetic SST analogs for all 5 hsstrs stably expressed in CHO-K1 cells under identical binding conditions. We show that hsstr2, 3, 5 react potently with hexapeptide as well as cyclic and linear octapeptide analogs and belong to a similar sstr subclass. hsstr1 and 4 react poorly with these analogs and belong to a separate subclass. The present generation of SST analogs exhibit a modest-50 fold increase in binding potency compared to SST-14 for 2 subtypes (hsstr2, 3), and relative selectivity for only 1 subtype (hsstr2) which is at best only 35 fold. The potency and degree of selectivity of these analogs is several orders of magnitude less than that reported earlier and suggests the need for caution in using these compounds as putative superagonists or subtype selective compounds for any of the individual sstrs.

Cloned somatostatin receptors: identification of subtype-selective peptides and demonstration of high affinity binding of linear peptides.[Pubmed:8100350]

Mol Pharmacol. 1993 Jun;43(6):838-44.

The recent molecular cloning of the genes encoding three somatostatin (SRIF) receptor subtypes has allowed for the individual expression of these receptors in mammalian cells and characterization of their respective pharmacological profiles. In the present study, we have investigated the affinities of a battery of SRIF analogues to bind to SRIF receptor subtypes SSTR1 (cloned somatostatin complex), SSTR2, and SSTR3, as well as their abilities to inhibit the release of growth hormone from anterior pituitary cells in vitro. We labeled SSTR1 and SSTR3 receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary and COS-1 cells, respectively, with the metabolically stable SRIF analogue 125I-CGP 23996. SSTR2 receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells were labeled with the SSTR2-specific radioligand 125I-MK-678. Inhibition studies were performed using SRIF analogues of differing structures, including hexapeptide analogues similar to MK-678, octapeptide analogues similar to SMS 201-995, pentapeptide analogues similar to c[Ahep-Phe-D-Trp-Lys-Thr(Bzl)] (SA), and linear SRIF analogues. SSTR1 bound SRIF and SRIF-28 with high affinity and the peptide SA and its structural analogues with low affinity. The hexapeptides did not interact with SSTR1 at concentrations as high as 1 microM, and only a few of the octapeptides or linear peptides bound, with very low affinities. In contrast, 125I-MK-678 binding to SSTR2 was potently inhibited by the hexapeptides, octapeptides, and some of the linear compounds, whereas SA and its analogues did not bind to SSTR2. The potencies of the various SRIF agonists to inhibit growth hormone release in vitro was highly correlated with their potencies to inhibit radioligand binding to SSTR2, but not to SSTR1 or SSTR3. SSTR3 bound analogues of each class but with moderate to low affinities, with the exception of several linear peptides and one of the octapeptides. We report for the first time the binding affinities of linear analogues of SRIF, some of which display subnanomolar affinities and are highly selective for SRIF receptor subtypes. Most importantly, these studies identify several peptide analogues that are highly potent, specific, and selective for individual subtypes of SRIF receptors. Such information, coupled with the knowledge of the distribution of these receptor subtypes in normal and pathological tissues, will be critical for more specific experimental and therapeutic interventions.