RefametinibMEK 1/ MEK 2 inhibitor CAS# 923032-37-5 |
- Safinamide Mesylate
Catalog No.:BCC2320
CAS No.:202825-46-5
- Moclobemide (Ro 111163)
Catalog No.:BCC2322
CAS No.:71320-77-9
Quality Control & MSDS
Number of papers citing our products
Chemical structure
3D structure
Cas No. | 923032-37-5 | SDF | Download SDF |
PubChem ID | 44182295 | Appearance | Powder |
Formula | C19H20F3IN2O5S | M.Wt | 572.34 |
Type of Compound | N/A | Storage | Desiccate at -20°C |
Synonyms | BAY 869766; BAY 86-97661; RDEA119 | ||
Solubility | DMSO : ≥ 31 mg/mL (54.16 mM) *"≥" means soluble, but saturation unknown. | ||
Chemical Name | N-[3,4-difluoro-2-(2-fluoro-4-iodoanilino)-6-methoxyphenyl]-1-[(2S)-2,3-dihydroxypropyl]cyclopropane-1-sulfonamide | ||
SMILES | COC1=CC(=C(C(=C1NS(=O)(=O)C2(CC2)CC(CO)O)NC3=C(C=C(C=C3)I)F)F)F | ||
Standard InChIKey | RDSACQWTXKSHJT-NSHDSACASA-N | ||
Standard InChI | InChI=1S/C19H20F3IN2O5S/c1-30-15-7-13(21)16(22)18(24-14-3-2-10(23)6-12(14)20)17(15)25-31(28,29)19(4-5-19)8-11(27)9-26/h2-3,6-7,11,24-27H,4-5,8-9H2,1H3/t11-/m0/s1 | ||
General tips | For obtaining a higher solubility , please warm the tube at 37 ℃ and shake it in the ultrasonic bath for a while.Stock solution can be stored below -20℃ for several months. We recommend that you prepare and use the solution on the same day. However, if the test schedule requires, the stock solutions can be prepared in advance, and the stock solution must be sealed and stored below -20℃. In general, the stock solution can be kept for several months. Before use, we recommend that you leave the vial at room temperature for at least an hour before opening it. |
||
About Packaging | 1. The packaging of the product may be reversed during transportation, cause the high purity compounds to adhere to the neck or cap of the vial.Take the vail out of its packaging and shake gently until the compounds fall to the bottom of the vial. 2. For liquid products, please centrifuge at 500xg to gather the liquid to the bottom of the vial. 3. Try to avoid loss or contamination during the experiment. |
||
Shipping Condition | Packaging according to customer requirements(5mg, 10mg, 20mg and more). Ship via FedEx, DHL, UPS, EMS or other couriers with RT, or blue ice upon request. |
Description | Refametinib (RDEA119, Bay 86-9766) is a potent, ATP non-competitive and highly selective inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2 with IC50 values of 19 nM and 47 nM, respectively. | |||||
Targets | MEK1 | MEK2 | ||||
IC50 | 19 nM | 47 nM |
Refametinib Dilution Calculator
Refametinib Molarity Calculator
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | 20 mg | 25 mg | |
1 mM | 1.7472 mL | 8.7361 mL | 17.4721 mL | 34.9443 mL | 43.6803 mL |
5 mM | 0.3494 mL | 1.7472 mL | 3.4944 mL | 6.9889 mL | 8.7361 mL |
10 mM | 0.1747 mL | 0.8736 mL | 1.7472 mL | 3.4944 mL | 4.368 mL |
50 mM | 0.0349 mL | 0.1747 mL | 0.3494 mL | 0.6989 mL | 0.8736 mL |
100 mM | 0.0175 mL | 0.0874 mL | 0.1747 mL | 0.3494 mL | 0.4368 mL |
* Note: If you are in the process of experiment, it's necessary to make the dilution ratios of the samples. The dilution data above is only for reference. Normally, it's can get a better solubility within lower of Concentrations. |
Calcutta University
University of Minnesota
University of Maryland School of Medicine
University of Illinois at Chicago
The Ohio State University
University of Zurich
Harvard University
Colorado State University
Auburn University
Yale University
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Washington State University
Stanford University
University of Leipzig
Universidade da Beira Interior
The Institute of Cancer Research
Heidelberg University
University of Amsterdam
University of Auckland
TsingHua University
The University of Michigan
Miami University
DRURY University
Jilin University
Fudan University
Wuhan University
Sun Yat-sen University
Universite de Paris
Deemed University
Auckland University
The University of Tokyo
Korea University
Refametinib is a selective and orally available allosteric inhibitor of MEK 1 and MEK 2 with IC50 values of 19nM and 47nM, respectively [1].
Refametinib is a non–ATP-competitive inhibitor of MEK1/2. It inhibits MEK activity in an in vitro assay with IC50 values of 19nM and 47nM for MEK1 and MEK2, respectively. X-ray shows refametinib binds to an allosteric site of MEK. It does not affect ATP binding but precludes binding to the substrate ERK, thus preventing ERK phosphorylation. Refametinib inhibits MEK with EC50 values ranging from 2.5nM to 15.8nM in a variety of human cancer cells including A375, Colo205, HT-29 and MDA-MB-231. In addition, in the cancer cell lines harboring V600E BRAF mutant, refametinib suppresses cell growth with GI50 values ranging from 67nM to 89nM. Furthermore, in the human melanoma A375 tumor xenograft model, treatment of refametinib causes obvious tumor growth delay and regression. Refametinib also shows tumor growth inhibition in the xenograft model of human Colo205 tumor [1].
References:
[1] Iverson C, Larson G, Lai C, et al. RDEA119/BAY 869766: a potent, selective, allosteric inhibitor of MEK1/2 for the treatment of cancer. Cancer research, 2009, 69(17): 6839-6847.
- 3-O-Methyl-3-methoxymaxterone
Catalog No.:BCC8639
CAS No.:92282-70-7
- Sanggenon N
Catalog No.:BCN4846
CAS No.:92280-12-1
- (±)-MDMA hydrochloride
Catalog No.:BCC5965
CAS No.:92279-84-0
- Daphnilongeridine
Catalog No.:BCN4460
CAS No.:922522-15-4
- Syringin pentaacetate
Catalog No.:BCN4459
CAS No.:92233-55-1
- 5,6-Desmethylenedioxy-5-methoxyaglalactone
Catalog No.:BCN7639
CAS No.:922169-96-8
- GlcNAcstatin
Catalog No.:BCC5334
CAS No.:922163-64-2
- SCH 529074
Catalog No.:BCC6131
CAS No.:922150-11-6
- 12-O-Tiglylphorbol-13-isobutyrate
Catalog No.:BCN2512
CAS No.:92214-54-5
- Phosphocreatine disodium salt
Catalog No.:BCC7918
CAS No.:922-32-7
- Capecitabine-2',3'-cyclic carbonate
Catalog No.:BCC8903
CAS No.:921769-65-5
- Neuromedin N (rat, mouse, porcine, canine)
Catalog No.:BCC5840
CAS No.:92169-45-4
- Refametinib R enantiomer
Catalog No.:BCC4055
CAS No.:923032-38-6
- SAR407899 hydrochloride
Catalog No.:BCC5592
CAS No.:923262-96-8
- Opicapone
Catalog No.:BCC6545
CAS No.:923287-50-7
- Nilotinib monohydrochloride monohydrate
Catalog No.:BCC1801
CAS No.:923288-90-8
- SAR407899
Catalog No.:BCC5593
CAS No.:923359-38-0
- ABT-263 (Navitoclax)
Catalog No.:BCC1272
CAS No.:923564-51-6
- GSK962040
Catalog No.:BCC4163
CAS No.:923565-21-3
- GSK962040 hydrochloride
Catalog No.:BCC4152
CAS No.:923565-22-4
- Vaniprevir
Catalog No.:BCC2030
CAS No.:923590-37-8
- Simeprevir
Catalog No.:BCC1949
CAS No.:923604-59-5
- 3-Acetoxy-4-cadinen-8-one
Catalog No.:BCN4461
CAS No.:923950-05-4
- DUBs-IN-3
Catalog No.:BCC5258
CAS No.:924296-17-3
Allosteric MEK1/2 inhibitor refametinib (BAY 86-9766) in combination with sorafenib exhibits antitumor activity in preclinical murine and rat models of hepatocellular carcinoma.[Pubmed:24204195]
Neoplasia. 2013 Oct;15(10):1161-71.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the allosteric mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor BAY 86-9766 in monotherapy and in combination with sorafenib in orthotopic and subcutaneous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) models with different underlying etiologies in two species. DESIGN: Antiproliferative potential of BAY 86-9766 and synergistic effects with sorafenib were studied in several HCC cell lines. Relevant pathway signaling was studied in MH3924a cells. For in vivo testing, the HCC cells were implanted subcutaneously or orthotopically. Survival and mode of action (MoA) were analyzed. RESULTS: BAY 86-9766 exhibited potent antiproliferative activity in HCC cell lines with half-maximal inhibitory concentration values ranging from 33 to 762 nM. BAY 86-9766 was strongly synergistic with sorafenib in suppressing tumor cell proliferation and inhibiting phosphorylation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). BAY 86-9766 prolonged survival in Hep3B xenografts, murine Hepa129 allografts, and MH3924A rat allografts. Additionally, tumor growth, ascites formation, and serum alpha-fetoprotein levels were reduced. Synergistic effects in combination with sorafenib were shown in Huh-7, Hep3B xenografts, and MH3924A allografts. On the signaling pathway level, the combination of BAY 86-9766 and sorafenib led to inhibition of the upregulatory feedback loop toward MEK phosphorylation observed after BAY 86-9766 monotreatment. With regard to the underlying MoA, inhibition of ERK phosphorylation, tumor cell proliferation, and microvessel density was observed in vivo. CONCLUSION: BAY 86-9766 shows potent single-agent antitumor activity and acts synergistically in combination with sorafenib in preclinical HCC models. These results support the ongoing clinical development of BAY 86-9766 and sorafenib in advanced HCC.
A phase II study of the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of the MEK inhibitor refametinib (BAY 86-9766) plus sorafenib for Asian patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.[Pubmed:25294897]
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Dec 1;20(23):5976-85.
PURPOSE: There is an unmet need for treatment options in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib is currently the only approved systemic treatment for HCC. Refametinib, an oral, allosteric MEK inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in combination with sorafenib in vitro and in vivo. A phase II study evaluated efficacy and safety of Refametinib plus sorafenib in Asian patients with HCC (NCT01204177). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligible patients received twice-daily Refametinib 50 mg plus twice-daily sorafenib 200 mg (morning)/400 mg (evening), with dose escalation to sorafenib 400 mg twice daily from cycle 2 if no grade >/= 2 hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue, or gastrointestinal toxicity occurred. Primary efficacy endpoint: disease control rate. Secondary endpoints: time to progression, overall survival, pharmacokinetic assessment, biomarker analysis, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS: Of 95 enrolled patients, 70 received study treatment. Most patients had liver cirrhosis (82.9%) and hepatitis B viral infection (75.7%). Disease control rate was 44.8% (primary efficacy analysis; n = 58). Median time to progression was 122 days, median overall survival was 290 days (n = 70). Best clinical responders had RAS mutations; majority of poor responders had wild-type RAS. Most frequent drug-related adverse events were diarrhea, rash, aspartate aminotransferase elevation, vomiting, and nausea. Dose modifications due to adverse events were necessary in almost all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Refametinib plus sorafenib showed antitumor activity in patients with HCC and was tolerated at reduced doses by most patients. Frequent dose modifications due to grade 3 adverse events may have contributed to limited treatment effect. Patients with RAS mutations appear to benefit from Refametinib/sorafenib combination.
A Phase I Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Combination Therapy with Refametinib plus Sorafenib in Patients with Advanced Cancer.[Pubmed:26644411]
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 May 15;22(10):2368-76.
PURPOSE: To assess the safety and tolerability of the small-molecule allosteric MEK inhibitor Refametinib combined with sorafenib, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This phase I dose-escalation study included an expansion phase at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Patients received Refametinib/sorafenib twice daily for 28 days, from a dose of Refametinib 5 mg plus sorafenib 200 mg to a dose of Refametinib 50 mg plus sorafenib 400 mg. Plasma levels of Refametinib, Refametinib metabolite M17, and sorafenib were measured for pharmacokinetic assessments. Tumors were biopsied at the MTD for analysis of MEK pathway mutations and ERK phosphorylation. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation cohort. The MTD was Refametinib 50 mg twice daily plus sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. The most common treatment-related toxicities were diarrhea and fatigue. Refametinib was readily absorbed following oral administration (plasma half-life of approximately 16 hours at the MTD), and pharmacokinetic parameters displayed near-dose proportionality, with less than 2-fold accumulation after multiple dosing. Another 30 patients were enrolled in the MTD cohort; 19 had hepatocellular carcinoma. The combination was associated with significantly reduced ERK phosphorylation in 5 out of 6 patients biopsied, with the greatest reductions in those with KRAS or BRAF mutations. Disease was stabilized in approximately half of patients, and 1 patient with colorectal cancer achieved a partial response at the MTD lasting approximately 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase I study, Refametinib plus sorafenib was well tolerated, with good oral absorption, near-dose proportionality, and target inhibition in a range of tumor types. Clin Cancer Res; 22(10); 2368-76. (c)2015 AACR.
Phase I/II Study of Refametinib (BAY 86-9766) in Combination with Gemcitabine in Advanced Pancreatic cancer.[Pubmed:27975152]
Target Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(1):97-109.
BACKGROUND: Activating KRAS mutations are reported in up to 90% of pancreatic cancers. Refametinib potently inhibits MEK1/2, part of the MAPK signaling pathway. This phase I/II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of Refametinib plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Phase I comprised dose escalation, followed by phase II expansion. Refametinib and gemcitabine plasma levels were analyzed for pharmacokinetics. KRAS mutational status was determined from circulating tumor DNA. RESULTS: Ninety patients overall received treatment. The maximum tolerated dose was Refametinib 50 mg twice daily plus standard gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) weekly). The combination was well tolerated, with no pharmacokinetic interaction. Treatment-emergent toxicities included thrombocytopenia, fatigue, anemia, and edema. The objective response rate was 23% and the disease control rate was 73%. Overall response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were higher in patients without detectable KRAS mutations (48% vs. 28%, 81% vs. 69%, 8.8 vs. 5.3 months, and 18.2 vs. 6.6 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: Refametinib plus gemcitabine was well tolerated, with a promising objective response rate, and had an acceptable safety profile and no pharmacokinetic interaction. There was a trend towards improved outcomes in patients without detectable KRAS mutations that deserves future investigation.