2,6-TropanediolCAS# 65356-02-7 |
2D Structure
Quality Control & MSDS
3D structure
Package In Stock
Number of papers citing our products
Cas No. | 65356-02-7 | SDF | Download SDF |
PubChem ID | 14447045 | Appearance | Oil |
Formula | C8H15NO2 | M.Wt | 157.21 |
Type of Compound | Alkaloids | Storage | Desiccate at -20°C |
Solubility | Soluble in Chloroform,Dichloromethane,Ethyl Acetate,DMSO,Acetone,etc. | ||
Chemical Name | 8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-4,7-diol | ||
SMILES | CN1C2CCC(C1CC2O)O | ||
Standard InChIKey | ZKNMCJMDJTZIFN-UHFFFAOYSA-N | ||
General tips | For obtaining a higher solubility , please warm the tube at 37 ℃ and shake it in the ultrasonic bath for a while.Stock solution can be stored below -20℃ for several months. We recommend that you prepare and use the solution on the same day. However, if the test schedule requires, the stock solutions can be prepared in advance, and the stock solution must be sealed and stored below -20℃. In general, the stock solution can be kept for several months. Before use, we recommend that you leave the vial at room temperature for at least an hour before opening it. |
||
About Packaging | 1. The packaging of the product may be reversed during transportation, cause the high purity compounds to adhere to the neck or cap of the vial.Take the vail out of its packaging and shake gently until the compounds fall to the bottom of the vial. 2. For liquid products, please centrifuge at 500xg to gather the liquid to the bottom of the vial. 3. Try to avoid loss or contamination during the experiment. |
||
Shipping Condition | Packaging according to customer requirements(5mg, 10mg, 20mg and more). Ship via FedEx, DHL, UPS, EMS or other couriers with RT, or blue ice upon request. |
2,6-Tropanediol Dilution Calculator
2,6-Tropanediol Molarity Calculator
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | 20 mg | 25 mg | |
1 mM | 6.3609 mL | 31.8046 mL | 63.6092 mL | 127.2184 mL | 159.023 mL |
5 mM | 1.2722 mL | 6.3609 mL | 12.7218 mL | 25.4437 mL | 31.8046 mL |
10 mM | 0.6361 mL | 3.1805 mL | 6.3609 mL | 12.7218 mL | 15.9023 mL |
50 mM | 0.1272 mL | 0.6361 mL | 1.2722 mL | 2.5444 mL | 3.1805 mL |
100 mM | 0.0636 mL | 0.318 mL | 0.6361 mL | 1.2722 mL | 1.5902 mL |
* Note: If you are in the process of experiment, it's necessary to make the dilution ratios of the samples. The dilution data above is only for reference. Normally, it's can get a better solubility within lower of Concentrations. |
Calcutta University
University of Minnesota
University of Maryland School of Medicine
University of Illinois at Chicago
The Ohio State University
University of Zurich
Harvard University
Colorado State University
Auburn University
Yale University
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Washington State University
Stanford University
University of Leipzig
Universidade da Beira Interior
The Institute of Cancer Research
Heidelberg University
University of Amsterdam
University of Auckland
TsingHua University
The University of Michigan
Miami University
DRURY University
Jilin University
Fudan University
Wuhan University
Sun Yat-sen University
Universite de Paris
Deemed University
Auckland University
The University of Tokyo
Korea University
- Demethylvestitol
Catalog No.:BCN4079
CAS No.:65332-45-8
- Scopolamine hydrobromide trihydrate
Catalog No.:BCC8188
CAS No.:6533-68-2
- L-Norgestrel
Catalog No.:BCC9105
CAS No.:797-64-8
- Primulic Acid 1
Catalog No.:BCC8236
CAS No.:65312-86-9
- Calhex 231 hydrochloride
Catalog No.:BCC7931
CAS No.:652973-93-8
- Ketoconazole
Catalog No.:BCC2272
CAS No.:65277-42-1
- Arvenin II
Catalog No.:BCN7878
CAS No.:65247-28-1
- Cucurbitacin B 2-O-beta-D-glucoside
Catalog No.:BCN3119
CAS No.:65247-27-0
- Dehydrocrenatidine
Catalog No.:BCN4196
CAS No.:65236-62-6
- N-Glyceryltaurine
Catalog No.:BCN1753
CAS No.:65222-42-6
- Gossypin
Catalog No.:BCN7987
CAS No.:652-78-8
- Isosorbide
Catalog No.:BCC4667
CAS No.:652-67-5
- H-D-Pro-OMe.HCl
Catalog No.:BCC3025
CAS No.:65365-28-8
- D-Chicoric Acid
Catalog No.:BCC8148
CAS No.:52248-48-3
- alpha-Isowighteone
Catalog No.:BCN4197
CAS No.:65388-03-6
- Bestatin hydrochloride
Catalog No.:BCC3908
CAS No.:65391-42-6
- Morin hydrate
Catalog No.:BCC8214
CAS No.:654055-01-3
- Altholactone
Catalog No.:BCN4786
CAS No.:65408-91-5
- H-D-Asp-Ome
Catalog No.:BCC2896
CAS No.:65414-78-0
- Boc-Asn(Xan)-OH
Catalog No.:BCC3361
CAS No.:65420-40-8
- DL-Dab.2HCl
Catalog No.:BCC2669
CAS No.:65427-54-5
- 1-Methoxyphaseollidin
Catalog No.:BCN7185
CAS No.:65428-13-9
- Phebalosin
Catalog No.:BCN4198
CAS No.:6545-99-9
- Acantrifoic acid A
Catalog No.:BCN6488
CAS No.:654663-85-1
Association Between Early Low-Dose Hydrocortisone Therapy in Extremely Preterm Neonates and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 2 Years of Age.[Pubmed:28384828]
JAMA. 2017 Apr 4;317(13):1329-1337.
Importance: Dexamethasone to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm neonates was associated with adverse neurodevelopmental events. Early low-dose hydrocortisone treatment has been reported to improve survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia but its safety with regard to neurodevelopment remains to be assessed. Objective: To assess whether early hydrocortisone therapy in extremely preterm infants is associated with neurodevelopmental impairment at 2 years of age. Design, Setting, and Participants: An exploratory secondary analysis of the PREMILOC (Early Low-Dose Hydrocortisone to Improve Survival without Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Preterm Infants) randomized clinical trial conducted between 2008 and 2014 in 21 French neonatal intensive care units. Randomization was stratified by gestational age groups. Neurodevelopmental assessments were completed from 2010 to 2016. Interventions: After birth, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or hydrocortisone (0.5 mg/kg twice per day for 7 days, followed by 0.5 mg/kg per day for 3 days). Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified exploratory secondary outcome of neurodevelopmental impairment was based on a standardized neurological examination and the revised Brunet-Lezine scale (global developmental quotient score and subscores; mean norm, 100 [SD, 15]). The minimal clinically important difference on the global developmental quotient was 5 points. Results: Of 1072 neonates screened, 523 were assigned to hydrocortisone (n = 256) or placebo (n = 267) and 406 survived to 2 years of age. A total of 379 patients (93%; 46% female) were evaluated (194 in the hydrocortisone group and 185 in the placebo group) at a median corrected age of 22 months (interquartile range, 21-23 months). The distribution of patients without neurodevelopmental impairment (73% in the hydrocortisone group vs 70% in the placebo group), with mild neurodevelopmental impairment (20% in the hydrocortisone group vs 18% in the placebo group), or with moderate to severe neurodevelopmental impairment (7% in the hydrocortisone group vs 11% in the placebo group) was not statistically significantly different between groups (P = .33). The mean global developmental quotient score was not statistically significantly different between groups (91.7 in the hydrocortisone group vs 91.4 in the placebo group; between-group difference, 0.3 [95% CI, -2.7 to 3.4]; P = .83). The incidence of cerebral palsy or other major neurological impairments was not significantly different between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this exploratory analysis of secondary outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of extremely preterm infants, early low-dose hydrocortisone was not associated with a statistically significant difference in neurodevelopment at 2 years of age. Further randomized studies are needed to provide definitive assessment of the neurodevelopmental safety of hydrocortisone in extremely preterm infants. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00623740.
Determining the 2-Dimensional Threshold for Perception of Artificial-Appearing Lips.[Pubmed:28384792]
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Sep 1;19(5):392-398.
Importance: Recognizing the perceptual threshold for artificial-appearing lips is important to avoid an undesirable outcome of treatment. Objective: To characterize the quantitative measurements for the perceptual threshold of artificial- and unnatural-appearing lips. Design, Setting, and Participants: Photographs of a female model's lips were digitally altered incrementally in 5 sets of features (the upper lip, lower lip, upper and lower lips, and shape of the Cupid's bow). From December 1, 2013, to January 30, 2014, participants viewed the photographs in random sequence using an online survey and responded to 2 questionnaires after each photograph. The participants were prompted to respond whether each altered photograph of the lips appeared to have received any cosmetic treatment, and whether the lips looked attractive and natural or artificial and unnatural. The measurement of each lip at which 50% of the observers perceived the lips as being treated and 50% of the observers perceived the lips as being artificial was determined. The difference in these 2 measurements was defined as dTA50, which represents the threshold differential between the perception of treated lips and artificial lips for 50% of the observers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survey responses of the participants to the appearance of the lips in the photographs. Results: A total of 98 participants (76 females and 22 males; mean age, 42 years) provided usable responses to the survey. Each area of the lips had a unique quantitative measurement at which the observers perceived the lips as being treated and artificial. Enhancement of the upper lip alone had a narrower margin for artificial appearance (dTA50, 0.9 mm) compared with enhancement of both the upper and lower lips (dTA50, 1.5 mm). Any alteration to the Cupid's bow resulted in the narrowest margin for artificial appearance (dTA50, 0.3 mm). The difference in the perceptual threshold between the age of the observers was the most significant for the upper lip. Conclusions and Relevance: The perceptual threshold for treated and/or artificial appearance is unique for each area of the lips. Level of Evidence: NA.