Perampanel

Perampanel is a selective noncompetitive AMPA-type glutamate receptor antagonist which has demonstrated anticonvulsant activity in experimental seizure models and antiepileptic activity in clinical trials. Perampanel is currently in regulatory submission for partial-onset seizures associated with epilepsy.

Budget impact of perampanel as adjunctive treatment of uncontrolled partial-onset and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the United States.[Pubmed:28236697]

Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Mar;68:196-202.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the budget impact (BI) of adopting Perampanel for adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures (POS), with or without secondarily generalized seizures, and the adjunctive treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) in patients 12years or older in the United States. METHODS: A BI model was developed to estimate the potential BI of adopting adjunctive Perampanel from a US payer (direct costs only) and societal (direct and indirect costs) perspective over a 5-year period. Efficacy data for Perampanel and antiepileptic drug (AED) maintenance therapy were obtained from Perampanel phase III clinical trials. Drug, direct medical (healthcare provider, emergency room, and hospitalizations), and indirect (productivity loss) costs were obtained from appropriate sources (e.g., AnalySource(R) Online [wholesale acquisition costs], 2013 Optum Insight Clinformatics Database [market share percentages, direct medical costs per unit], and 2011-2013 National Health and Wellness Survey [NHWS; healthcare resource utilization, overall work impairment, and baseline distribution of patients across the 4 health states]). Mapping of seizure frequency to medical resource utilization and work impairment was obtained from Kantar Health's NHWS. RESULTS: In a hypothetical health plan of 1 million members, 660 (0.066%) members >/=12years old had uncontrolled POS (395 [59.8%]) or PGTCS (265 [40.2%]). During the first 5years of adoption of Perampanel, absolute BI (including drug, direct medical, and indirect costs) was $852, $2124, $3855, $5318, and $6397, respectively, for a cumulative absolute BI of $18,545. Drug cost was estimated to increase by $13,888, $34,646, $62,863, $86,728, and $104,326, respectively; however, this cost would be mostly offset by decreases in direct medical ($5041, $12,576, $22,818, $31,481, and $37,869, respectively) and indirect ($7995, $19,946, $36,190, $49,929, and $60,060, respectively) costs. Total per-member-per-month cost (drug and direct medical costs) was estimated to increase by $0.0007, $0.0018, $0.0033, $0.0046, and $0.0055 from years 1 to 5. CONCLUSIONS: Based on results of this BI model, increased cost of adopting Perampanel in a health plan of 1 million members would be minimal for payers, and societal costs would be close to neutral.

Perampanel in 12 patients with Unverricht-Lundborg disease.[Pubmed:28166365]

Epilepsia. 2017 Apr;58(4):543-547.

OBJECTIVE: Perampanel (PER) was used in 12 patients with Unverricht-Lundborg disease (ULD) to evaluate its efficacy against myoclonus and seizures. METHODS: We treated 11 patients with EPM1 mutations (6 F, 5 M, aged 13-62 years) and a 43-year-old man with de novo KCNC1 mutation. PER was introduced by 2 mg steps at 2-4 week intervals until 6 mg/day, with a possible dose reduction or dose increase. RESULTS: Ten patients had a clear clinical response of myoclonus, and five were able to reduce concomitant therapy. Improvement was noted sometimes as soon as with 2 mg/day. Epileptic seizures stopped on PER in the six patients who still had experienced generalized tonic-clonic or myoclonic seizures (100%). Some abatement of efficacy on myoclonus was seen in two patients who still retained some benefit. Weight gain was reported in six patients (50%). Psychological and behavioral side-effects were observed in six patients (50%) and led to withdrawal of PER in three cases and dose reduction in three, with abatement of the problems. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides evidence that for ULD patients, PER may show marked efficacy even in severe cases, particularly against myoclonus, but also against seizures. PER should thus be tried in ULD patients whose seizures are not satisfactorily controlled. Its use is limited because of psychological and behavioral side effects, with higher doses of approximately 6 mg/day or greater likely risk factors.