Rifapentineantibiotic drug used in the treatment of tuberculosis CAS# 61379-65-5 |
2D Structure
- Ascomycin(FK 520)
Catalog No.:BCC1370
CAS No.:104987-12-4
- Cefoselis
Catalog No.:BCC4092
CAS No.:122841-10-5
- Rifampin
Catalog No.:BCC4839
CAS No.:13292-46-1
- Faropenem daloxate
Catalog No.:BCC1571
CAS No.:141702-36-5
- Cephalexin
Catalog No.:BCC4646
CAS No.:15686-71-2
- Azithromycin
Catalog No.:BCC4385
CAS No.:83905-01-5
Quality Control & MSDS
3D structure
Package In Stock
Number of papers citing our products
Cas No. | 61379-65-5 | SDF | Download SDF |
PubChem ID | 6323497 | Appearance | Powder |
Formula | C47H64N4O12 | M.Wt | 877.03 |
Type of Compound | N/A | Storage | Desiccate at -20°C |
Synonyms | DL 473; Cyclopentylrifampicin | ||
Solubility | DMSO : ≥ 50 mg/mL (57.01 mM) H2O : < 0.1 mg/mL (insoluble) *"≥" means soluble, but saturation unknown. | ||
SMILES | CC1C=CC=C(C(=O)NC2=C(C3=C(C(=C4C(=C3C(=O)C2=CNN5CCN(CC5)C6CCCC6)C(=O)C(O4)(OC=CC(C(C(C(C(C(C1O)C)O)C)OC(=O)C)C)OC)C)C)O)O)C | ||
Standard InChIKey | RISDZDVHYCURHD-QLWTZYDESA-N | ||
Standard InChI | InChI=1S/C47H64N4O12/c1-24-13-12-14-25(2)46(59)49-37-32(23-48-51-20-18-50(19-21-51)31-15-10-11-16-31)41(56)34-35(42(37)57)40(55)29(6)44-36(34)45(58)47(8,63-44)61-22-17-33(60-9)26(3)43(62-30(7)52)28(5)39(54)27(4)38(24)53/h12-14,17,22-24,26-28,31,33,38-39,43,48,53-55,57H,10-11,15-16,18-21H2,1-9H3,(H,49,59)/b13-12+,22-17+,25-14-,32-23+/t24-,26+,27+,28+,33-,38-,39+,43+,47-/m0/s1 | ||
General tips | For obtaining a higher solubility , please warm the tube at 37 ℃ and shake it in the ultrasonic bath for a while.Stock solution can be stored below -20℃ for several months. We recommend that you prepare and use the solution on the same day. However, if the test schedule requires, the stock solutions can be prepared in advance, and the stock solution must be sealed and stored below -20℃. In general, the stock solution can be kept for several months. Before use, we recommend that you leave the vial at room temperature for at least an hour before opening it. |
||
About Packaging | 1. The packaging of the product may be reversed during transportation, cause the high purity compounds to adhere to the neck or cap of the vial.Take the vail out of its packaging and shake gently until the compounds fall to the bottom of the vial. 2. For liquid products, please centrifuge at 500xg to gather the liquid to the bottom of the vial. 3. Try to avoid loss or contamination during the experiment. |
||
Shipping Condition | Packaging according to customer requirements(5mg, 10mg, 20mg and more). Ship via FedEx, DHL, UPS, EMS or other couriers with RT, or blue ice upon request. |
Description | Rifapentine (Priftin; DL 473) is an antibiotic compound used in the treatment of tuberculosis.
Target: Antibacterial
Rifapentine inhibits DNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity in susceptible cells. Specifically, it interacts with bacterial RNA polymerase but does not inhibit the mammalian enzyme. A review of alternative regimens for prevention of active tuberculosis in HIV-negative individuals with latent TB found that a weekly, directly observed regimen of rifapentine with isoniazid for three months was as effective as a daily, self -administered regimen of isoniazid for nine months. But the rifapentine-isoniazid regimen had higher rates of treatment completion and lower rates of hepatotoxicity . However the rates of treatment-limiting adverse events were higher in the rifapentine-isoniazid regimen [1]. References: |
Rifapentine Dilution Calculator
Rifapentine Molarity Calculator
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | 20 mg | 25 mg | |
1 mM | 1.1402 mL | 5.7011 mL | 11.4021 mL | 22.8042 mL | 28.5053 mL |
5 mM | 0.228 mL | 1.1402 mL | 2.2804 mL | 4.5608 mL | 5.7011 mL |
10 mM | 0.114 mL | 0.5701 mL | 1.1402 mL | 2.2804 mL | 2.8505 mL |
50 mM | 0.0228 mL | 0.114 mL | 0.228 mL | 0.4561 mL | 0.5701 mL |
100 mM | 0.0114 mL | 0.057 mL | 0.114 mL | 0.228 mL | 0.2851 mL |
* Note: If you are in the process of experiment, it's necessary to make the dilution ratios of the samples. The dilution data above is only for reference. Normally, it's can get a better solubility within lower of Concentrations. |
Calcutta University
University of Minnesota
University of Maryland School of Medicine
University of Illinois at Chicago
The Ohio State University
University of Zurich
Harvard University
Colorado State University
Auburn University
Yale University
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Washington State University
Stanford University
University of Leipzig
Universidade da Beira Interior
The Institute of Cancer Research
Heidelberg University
University of Amsterdam
University of Auckland
TsingHua University
The University of Michigan
Miami University
DRURY University
Jilin University
Fudan University
Wuhan University
Sun Yat-sen University
Universite de Paris
Deemed University
Auckland University
The University of Tokyo
Korea University
MIC: 0.015 - 0.06 mg/ml
Tuberculosis is a widespread, infectious disease caused by various mycobacteria strains, usually Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis typically attacks the lungs, but can also affect other parts of the body. Rifapentine is an antibiotic drug used in the treatment of tuberculosis.
In vitro: The activities of rifampin and rifapentine against Mycobacterium tuberculosis residing in human monocytederived macrophages were determined. The MIC and MBC of rifapentine for intracellular bacteria were two- to four-fold lower than those of rifampin. For extracellular bacteria, this difference was less noticeable. [1].
In vivo: Once-a-week exposure to rifapentine concentrations equivalent to that attained in blood after one 600-mg dose resulted during the first week in a dramatic decline in the number of bacteria, and such decline was maintained at a minimal level for a period of four weeks. The prolonged effect of rifapentine found may be associated with high ratios of intracellular accumulation, which were four- to fivefold higher than those found for rifampin [1].
Clinical trial: Rifapentine can be administered twice weekly during the intensive phase of tuberculosis treatment and then once weekly during the continuation phase of treatment. Its efficacy at the approved dosage of 600 mg may be slightly lower than that of rifampin. Studies are needed to determine if equal or greater efficacy could be achieved with higher doses of rifapentine [2].
Reference:
[1] Mor N, Simon B, Mezo N, Heifets L. Comparison of activities of rifapentine and rifampin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis residing in human macrophages. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Sep;39(9):2073-7.
[2] Temple ME, Nahata MC. Rifapentine: its role in the treatment of tuberculosis. Ann Pharmacother. 1999 Nov;33(11):1203-10.
- Griffonilide
Catalog No.:BCN1271
CAS No.:61371-55-9
- erythro-Guaiacylglycerol-beta-O-4'-dehydrodisinapyl ether
Catalog No.:BCN7024
CAS No.:613684-55-2
- TNP-ATP triethylammonium salt
Catalog No.:BCC7373
CAS No.:61368-63-6
- VU 0364770
Catalog No.:BCC4597
CAS No.:61350-00-3
- Boc-D-Glu-OH
Catalog No.:BCC2606
CAS No.:61348-28-6
- Boc-D-Gln-OH
Catalog No.:BCC2607
CAS No.:61348-28-5
- Amoxicillin trihydrate
Catalog No.:BCC5168
CAS No.:61336-70-7
- Neoschaftoside
Catalog No.:BCN3053
CAS No.:61328-41-4
- Sulconazole Nitrate
Catalog No.:BCC4853
CAS No.:61318-91-0
- Boc-D-Arg(Tos)-OH
Catalog No.:BCC3070
CAS No.:61315-61-5
- Isoacteoside
Catalog No.:BCN4137
CAS No.:61303-13-7
- Schisandrin C
Catalog No.:BCN1198
CAS No.:61301-33-5
- Trigonelline hydrochloride
Catalog No.:BCN1050
CAS No.:6138-41-6
- Naginata ketone
Catalog No.:BCN7801
CAS No.:6138-88-1
- 3-Amino-3-phenylpropionic acid
Catalog No.:BCC8609
CAS No.:614-19-7
- Procainamide HCl
Catalog No.:BCC5492
CAS No.:614-39-1
- 2-Hydroxycinnamic acid
Catalog No.:BCN5039
CAS No.:614-60-8
- 2,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid
Catalog No.:BCN4139
CAS No.:614-82-4
- Rolipram
Catalog No.:BCC2282
CAS No.:61413-54-5
- Carmofur
Catalog No.:BCC1214
CAS No.:61422-45-5
- 2-Amino-3-Formylchromone
Catalog No.:BCC8526
CAS No.:61424-76-8
- Z-D-Ala-ol
Catalog No.:BCC2589
CAS No.:61425-27-2
- Bisabola-3,10-dien-2-one
Catalog No.:BCN7510
CAS No.:61432-71-1
- CIS-Resveratrol
Catalog No.:BCC8150
CAS No.:61434-67-1
Defining the optimal dose of rifapentine for pulmonary tuberculosis: Exposure-response relations from two phase II clinical trials.[Pubmed:28124478]
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Aug;102(2):321-331.
Rifapentine is a highly active antituberculosis antibiotic with treatment-shortening potential; however, exposure-response relations and the dose needed for maximal bactericidal activity have not been established. We used pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data from 657 adults with pulmonary tuberculosis participating in treatment trials to compare Rifapentine (n = 405) with rifampin (n = 252) as part of intensive-phase therapy. Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses were performed with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Time to stable culture conversion of sputum to negative was determined in cultures obtained over 4 months of therapy. Rifapentine exposures were lower in participants who were coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus, black, male, or fasting when taking drug. Rifapentine exposure, large lung cavity size, and geographic region were independently associated with time to culture conversion in liquid media. Maximal treatment efficacy is likely achieved with Rifapentine at 1,200 mg daily. Patients with large lung cavities appear less responsive to treatment, even at high Rifapentine doses.
Drug Release Characteristics and Tissue Distribution of Rifapentine Polylactic Acid Sustained-Release Microspheres in Rabbits after Paravertebral Implantation.[Pubmed:28210500]
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016 Aug 13;18(11):e38661.
BACKGROUND: Rates of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) and TB associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection have increased dramatically, intensifying challenges in TB control. New formulations of TB treatment drugs that control drug release and increase local drug concentrations will have a significant impact on mitigating the toxic side effects and increasing the clinical efficacy of anti-TB drugs. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to observe the sustained release characteristics of Rifapentine polylactic acid sustained-release microspheres in vivo and the accumulation of Rifapentine in other tissues following paravertebral implantation. METHODS: This study is a basic animal experimental study that began on July 17, 2014 in the Fifth Affiliated hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. One hundred and eight New Zealand white rabbits (weighing 2.8 - 3.0 kg, male and female, China) were randomly divided into three groups of 36 rabbits each. Blood and tissue samples from the liver, lungs, kidneys, vertebrae, and paravertebral muscle were collected at different time points post-surgery. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis with a biological internal standard was used to determine the drug concentrations in samples. RESULTS: In group A, no significant differences in Rifapentine concentrations in the liver were detected between any two time points (P > 0.05). However, the differences in Rifapentine concentrations between day 10 and day 21 were statistically significant (P < 0.05); for days 21, 35, 46, and 60, the differences in Rifapentine concentrations between two sequential time points were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In group B, the differences in Rifapentine concentration between days 3 and 10 in vertebral bone and in paravertebral muscles were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Rifapentine was detected in the vertebral bone tissue in the group C animals. The Rifapentine concentrations between two sequential time points were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Rifapentine could not be detected in the paravertebral muscles 46 days after the operation. The differences in Rifapentine concentrations between two sequential time points among days 3, 10, 21, and 35 were statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: After paravertebral implantation of Rifapentine polylactic acid sustained-release microspheres, the concentration of Rifapentine in local vertebral bone tissues was maintained above the TB minimum inhibitory concentration for up to 60 days with no apparent accumulation of the drug in other tissues.
Treatment completion for latent tuberculosis infection: a retrospective cohort study comparing 9 months of isoniazid, 4 months of rifampin and 3 months of isoniazid and rifapentine.[Pubmed:28196479]
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 14;17(1):146.
BACKGROUND: The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended a new regimen for treatment of latent tuberculosis (three months of weekly isoniazid and Rifapentine) in late 2011. While completion rates of this regimen were reported to be higher than nine months of isoniazid, little is known about the completion rates of three months of isoniazid and Rifapentine compared to nine months of isoniazid or four months of rifampin in actual use scenarios. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing treatment completion for latent tuberculosis (TB) infection in patients treated with nine months of isoniazid, three months of isoniazid and Rifapentine or four months of rifampin in outpatient clinics and a public health TB clinic in Seattle, Washington. The primary outcome of treatment completion was defined as 270 doses of isoniazid within 12 months, 120 doses of rifampin within six months and 12 doses of isoniazid and Rifapentine within four months. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-three patients were included in the study. Patients were equally likely to complete three months of weekly isoniazid and Rifapentine or four months of rifampin (85% completion rate of both regimens), as compared to 52% in the nine months of isoniazid group (p < 0.001). These associations remained statistically significant even after adjusting for clinic location and type of monitoring. Monitoring type (weekly versus monthly versus less often than monthly) had less impact on treatment completion than the type of treatment offered. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were equally as likely to complete the three months of isoniazid and Rifapentine as four months of rifampin. Four months of rifampin is similar in efficacy compared to placebo as isoniazid and Rifapentine but does not require directly observed therapy (DOT), and is less expensive compared to combination therapy with isoniazid and Rifapentine, and thus can be the optimal treatment regimen to achieve the maximal efficacy in a community setting.
Three months of weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid for latent tuberculosis treatment in solid organ transplant candidates.[Pubmed:28276008]
Infection. 2017 Jun;45(3):335-339.
BACKGROUND: Isoniazid daily for 9 months is the recommended regimen for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates, but its use is controversial, due to reports of hepatotoxicity and low treatment completion rates. A 12-week course of once weekly directly observed therapy (DOT) with isoniazid plus Rifapentine (3HP) is a new LTBI treatment regimen. Tolerability and safety data of 3HP LTBI treatment in SOT candidates are limited. METHODS: Twelve consecutive SOT candidates who underwent DOT with 3HP for LTBI at Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA, between January 2013 and August 2016 were prospectively evaluated for tolerability and safety of 3HP. The diagnosis of LTBI was made in a person with a positive interferon-gamma release test, without a history of previously treated active or latent tuberculosis infection, and without signs, symptoms, or radiographic evidence of active tuberculosis. Patients were followed up 1 month after treatment completion and at routine follow-up visits with their transplant providers. RESULTS: Eleven patients were men, and the median age was 60 years (range 44-72). Eight patients were liver, and four kidney transplant candidates. The median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD score) was 17 (range 10-31). All patients completed treatment. Only a single patient developed transaminitis greater than twice the baseline value. Three patients underwent liver transplantation. None of them developed tuberculosis at 9, 22, or 40 months following transplantation. CONCLUSION: Directly observed 3HP LTBI treatment was not associated with hepatotoxicity, even in patients with higher MELD scores. Further studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of this LTBI treatment regimen in the SOT population.