Inolitazone dihydrochloridePPARγ agonist,high-affinity and novel CAS# 223132-38-5 |
- Gatifloxacin
Catalog No.:BCC1064
CAS No.:112811-59-3
- Dexrazoxane HCl (ICRF-187, ADR-529)
Catalog No.:BCC1087
CAS No.:149003-01-0
- Doxorubicin (Adriamycin) HCl
Catalog No.:BCC1117
CAS No.:25316-40-9
- Etoposide
Catalog No.:BCC1151
CAS No.:33419-42-0
- Genistein
Catalog No.:BCN5499
CAS No.:446-72-0
Quality Control & MSDS
3D structure
Package In Stock
Number of papers citing our products
| Cas No. | 223132-38-5 | SDF | Download SDF |
| PubChem ID | 16719220 | Appearance | Powder |
| Formula | C27H28Cl2N4O4S | M.Wt | 575.51 |
| Type of Compound | N/A | Storage | Desiccate at -20°C |
| Synonyms | Efatutazone; CS-7017; RS5444 | ||
| Solubility | DMSO : 25 mg/mL (43.44 mM; Need ultrasonic) H2O : < 0.1 mg/mL (insoluble) | ||
| Chemical Name | 5-[[4-[[6-(4-amino-3,5-dimethylphenoxy)-1-methylbenzimidazol-2-yl]methoxy]phenyl]methyl]-1,3-thiazolidine-2,4-dione;dihydrochloride | ||
| SMILES | CC1=CC(=CC(=C1N)C)OC2=CC3=C(C=C2)N=C(N3C)COC4=CC=C(C=C4)CC5C(=O)NC(=O)S5.Cl.Cl | ||
| Standard InChIKey | WFIOHOJEIMQCEG-UHFFFAOYSA-N | ||
| Standard InChI | InChI=1S/C27H26N4O4S.2ClH/c1-15-10-20(11-16(2)25(15)28)35-19-8-9-21-22(13-19)31(3)24(29-21)14-34-18-6-4-17(5-7-18)12-23-26(32)30-27(33)36-23;;/h4-11,13,23H,12,14,28H2,1-3H3,(H,30,32,33);2*1H | ||
| General tips | For obtaining a higher solubility , please warm the tube at 37 ℃ and shake it in the ultrasonic bath for a while.Stock solution can be stored below -20℃ for several months. We recommend that you prepare and use the solution on the same day. However, if the test schedule requires, the stock solutions can be prepared in advance, and the stock solution must be sealed and stored below -20℃. In general, the stock solution can be kept for several months. Before use, we recommend that you leave the vial at room temperature for at least an hour before opening it. |
||
| About Packaging | 1. The packaging of the product may be reversed during transportation, cause the high purity compounds to adhere to the neck or cap of the vial.Take the vail out of its packaging and shake gently until the compounds fall to the bottom of the vial. 2. For liquid products, please centrifuge at 500xg to gather the liquid to the bottom of the vial. 3. Try to avoid loss or contamination during the experiment. |
||
| Shipping Condition | Packaging according to customer requirements(5mg, 10mg, 20mg and more). Ship via FedEx, DHL, UPS, EMS or other couriers with RT, or blue ice upon request. | ||
| Description | Inolitazone dihydrochloride is a novel high-affinity PPARγ agonist that is dependent upon PPARγ for its biological activity with IC50 of 0.8 nM for growth inhibition.In Vitro:Inolitazone (RS5444) dihydrochloride upregulates the cell cycle kinase inhibitor, p21WAF1/CIP1. Silencing p21WAF1/CIP1 rendered cells insensitive to Inolitazone. A 10 nM dose of Inolitazone activates PPARγ:RXRα-dependent transcription as demonstrated in a transient transfection assay utilizing a PPRE response element fused to a luciferase reporter gene (PPRE3-tk-luc). DRO cells are treated in culture with Inolitazone, Rosiglitazone, or Troglitazone at the indicated concentrations. DRO cells are transiently transfected with PPRE3-tk-luc to examine effective concentrations at which EC50 occurs. The EC50s are 1 nM (Inolitazone), 65 nM (Rosiglitazone) and 631 nM (Troglitazone). Similarly, the calculated inhibitory concentration at IC50 is 0.8 nM for Inolitazone, 75 nM for Rosiglitazone, and 1412 nM for Troglitazone. Inolitazone specifically activates PPARγ, but not PPARα or PPARδ. Exposure of 10 nM Inolitazone following transient transfection with the appropriate PPAR isoform (γ, α, or δ) and PPAR response element linked to a luciferase reporter in RIE rat small intestinal cell line, which does not express PPARs, yields increased luciferase activity only in the presence of PPARγ and PPRE3-tk-luc[1]. DRO cells are growth inhibited by 10 nM Inolitazone (RS5444) through a PPARγ-dependent mechanism[2].In Vivo:Inolitazone (RS5444) plus Paclitaxel demonstrate additive antiproliferative activity in cell culture and minimal ATC tumor growth. When Inolitazone is administered in the diet to athymic nude mice prior to DRO tumor cell implantation, tumor growth is inhibited in a dose responsive fashion. At the highest dose, 0.025% Inolitazone inhibits growth on day 32 by 94.4% as compared to that of control. In this treatment group, five of 10 animals do not develop demonstrable tumors. In the 0.0025% treatment group, tumor growth is inhibited by 62.3% compared to that of control on day 32 while the 0.00025% dose demonstrated no growth inhibitory activity as compared to control. Tumors is nest allowed to establish in the mouse and began 0.025% Inolitazone treatment of mice 1 week after DRO or ARO tumor cell implantation. Inolitazone treated animals demonstrate tumor growth inhibition of 68.9% in DRO tumors and 48.3% in ARO tumors as compared to that of their respective controls on day 35[1]. References: | |||||
Inolitazone dihydrochloride Dilution Calculator
Inolitazone dihydrochloride Molarity Calculator
| 1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | 20 mg | 25 mg | |
| 1 mM | 1.7376 mL | 8.6879 mL | 17.3759 mL | 34.7518 mL | 43.4397 mL |
| 5 mM | 0.3475 mL | 1.7376 mL | 3.4752 mL | 6.9504 mL | 8.6879 mL |
| 10 mM | 0.1738 mL | 0.8688 mL | 1.7376 mL | 3.4752 mL | 4.344 mL |
| 50 mM | 0.0348 mL | 0.1738 mL | 0.3475 mL | 0.695 mL | 0.8688 mL |
| 100 mM | 0.0174 mL | 0.0869 mL | 0.1738 mL | 0.3475 mL | 0.4344 mL |
| * Note: If you are in the process of experiment, it's necessary to make the dilution ratios of the samples. The dilution data above is only for reference. Normally, it's can get a better solubility within lower of Concentrations. | |||||
Calcutta University
University of Minnesota
University of Maryland School of Medicine
University of Illinois at Chicago
The Ohio State University
University of Zurich
Harvard University
Colorado State University
Auburn University
Yale University
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Washington State University
Stanford University
University of Leipzig
Universidade da Beira Interior
The Institute of Cancer Research
Heidelberg University
University of Amsterdam
University of Auckland
TsingHua University
The University of Michigan
Miami University
DRURY University
Jilin University
Fudan University
Wuhan University
Sun Yat-sen University
Universite de Paris
Deemed University
Auckland University
The University of Tokyo
Korea University
Description: IC50 Value: 0.8 nM [1] Inolitazone(RS5444) is a novel high-affinity PPARgamma agonist, which activates PPARgamma with an EC50 about 1/50th that of rosiglitazone and has no effect on RIE cells that do not express PPARgamma. in vitro: In vitro, the IC50 for growth inhibition is approximately 0.8 nM while anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) tumor growth was inhibited three- to fourfold in nude mice. siRNA against PPARgamma and a pharmacological antagonist demonstrated that functional PPARgamma was required for growth inhibitory activity of RS5444. RS5444 upregulated the cell cycle kinase inhibitor, p21WAF1/CIP1 [1]. RS5444inhibited culture growth and caused irreversible G1 arrest, but did not induce apoptosis. In addition, RS5444 caused dramatic changes in cellular morphology which were associated with increased motility and diminished cellular adherence, but no increase in the ability of such cells to digest and invade Matrigel [2]. Treatment with RS5444 leads to the up-regulation of RhoB and subsequent activation of p21, and that silencing of RhoB by RNAi blocks the ability of RS5444 to induce p21 and to inhibit ATC cells proliferation [3]. in vivo: The median peak efatutazone blood level was 8.6 ng/mL for 0.15-mg dosing vs 22.0 ng/mL for 0.3-mg twice daily dosing [4]. Although efatutazone treatment did not reduce percentage of mice developing invasive cancer, it significantly reduced prevalence of noninvasive cancer and total number of cancers per mouse and increased prevalence of well-differentiated cancer subtypes not usually seen in this mouse model [5]. Clinical trial: CS-7017 in Combination with Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Subjects with Stage IIIb/IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Phase 1b
- Inolitazone
Catalog No.:BCC1652
CAS No.:223132-37-4
- SEA0400
Catalog No.:BCC1941
CAS No.:223104-29-8
- Finasteride acetate
Catalog No.:BCC4204
CAS No.:222989-99-3
- Noladin ether
Catalog No.:BCC5756
CAS No.:222723-55-9
- SZL P1-41
Catalog No.:BCC8004
CAS No.:222716-34-9
- Chysin A
Catalog No.:BCN2020
CAS No.:22269-11-0
- ACBC
Catalog No.:BCC6584
CAS No.:22264-50-2
- Antidesmone
Catalog No.:BCN5058
CAS No.:222629-77-8
- Bromocriptine mesylate
Catalog No.:BCC6642
CAS No.:22260-51-1
- Tempol
Catalog No.:BCC4862
CAS No.:2226-96-2
- Adoprazine
Catalog No.:BCC1329
CAS No.:222551-17-9
- Loganic acid
Catalog No.:BCN5057
CAS No.:22255-40-9
- Evodol
Catalog No.:BCN5059
CAS No.:22318-10-1
- Platycodigenin
Catalog No.:BCN3183
CAS No.:22327-82-8
- Methyl ferulate
Catalog No.:BCN4023
CAS No.:22329-76-6
- 9-Hydroxy-alpha-lapachone
Catalog No.:BCN5060
CAS No.:22333-58-0
- Grandiflorenic acid
Catalog No.:BCN4670
CAS No.:22338-67-6
- Grandifloric acid
Catalog No.:BCN4669
CAS No.:22338-69-8
- Polygalacic acid
Catalog No.:BCN5898
CAS No.:22338-71-2
- FG2216
Catalog No.:BCC6402
CAS No.:223387-75-5
- GLP-2 (human)
Catalog No.:BCC5891
CAS No.:223460-79-5
- ONO 4817
Catalog No.:BCC2375
CAS No.:223472-31-9
- YM 58483
Catalog No.:BCC7817
CAS No.:223499-30-7
- CPA inhibitor
Catalog No.:BCC1500
CAS No.:223532-02-3
Investigating antimalarial drug interactions of emetine dihydrochloride hydrate using CalcuSyn-based interactivity calculations.[Pubmed:28257497]
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12(3):e0173303.
The widespread introduction of artemisinin-based combination therapy has contributed to recent reductions in malaria mortality. Combination therapies have a range of advantages, including synergism, toxicity reduction, and delaying the onset of resistance acquisition. Unfortunately, antimalarial combination therapy is limited by the depleting repertoire of effective drugs with distinct target pathways. To fast-track antimalarial drug discovery, we have previously employed drug-repositioning to identify the anti-amoebic drug, emetine dihydrochloride hydrate, as a potential candidate for repositioned use against malaria. Despite its 1000-fold increase in in vitro antimalarial potency (ED50 47 nM) compared with its anti-amoebic potency (ED50 26-32 uM), practical use of the compound has been limited by dose-dependent toxicity (emesis and cardiotoxicity). Identification of a synergistic partner drug would present an opportunity for dose-reduction, thus increasing the therapeutic window. The lack of reliable and standardised methodology to enable the in vitro definition of synergistic potential for antimalarials is a major drawback. Here we use isobologram and combination-index data generated by CalcuSyn software analyses (Biosoft v2.1) to define drug interactivity in an objective, automated manner. The method, based on the median effect principle proposed by Chou and Talalay, was initially validated for antimalarial application using the known synergistic combination (atovaquone-proguanil). The combination was used to further understand the relationship between SYBR Green viability and cytocidal versus cytostatic effects of drugs at higher levels of inhibition. We report here the use of the optimised Chou Talalay method to define synergistic antimalarial drug interactivity between emetine dihydrochloride hydrate and atovaquone. The novel findings present a potential route to harness the nanomolar antimalarial efficacy of this affordable natural product.
Original research paper. Characterization and taste masking evaluation of microparticles with cetirizine dihydrochloride and methacrylate-based copolymer obtained by spray drying.[Pubmed:28231047]
Acta Pharm. 2017 Mar 1;67(1):113-124.
Taste of a pharmaceutical formulation is an important parameter for the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy. Cetirizine dihydrochloride (CET) is a second-generation antihistamine that is commonly administered in allergy treatment. CET is characterized by extremely bitter taste and it is a great challenge to successfully mask its taste; therefore the goal of this work was to formulate and characterize the microparticles obtained by the spray drying method with CET and poly(butyl methacrylate-co-(2-dimethylaminoethyl) methacrylate-co-methyl methacrylate 1:2:1 copolymer (Eudragit E PO) as a barrier coating. Assessment of taste masking by the electronic tongue has revealed that designed formulations created an effective taste masking barrier. Taste masking effect was also confirmed by the in vivo model and the in vitro release profile of CET. Obtained data have shown that microparticles with a drug/polymer ratio (0.5:1) are promising CET carriers with efficient taste masking potential and might be further used in designing orodispersible dosage forms with CET.
Pretreatment cognitive and neural differences between sapropterin dihydrochloride responders and non-responders with phenylketonuria.[Pubmed:28271047]
Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2017 Feb 23;12:8-13.
Sapropterin dihydrochloride (BH4) reduces phenylalanine (Phe) levels and improves white matter integrity in a subset of individuals with phenylketonuria (PKU) known as "responders." Although prior research has identified biochemical and genotypic differences between BH4 responders and non-responders, cognitive and neural differences remain largely unexplored. To this end, we compared intelligence and white matter integrity prior to treatment with BH4 in 13 subsequent BH4 responders with PKU, 16 subsequent BH4 non-responders with PKU, and 12 healthy controls. Results indicated poorer intelligence and white matter integrity in non-responders compared to responders prior to treatment. In addition, poorer white matter integrity was associated with greater variability in Phe across the lifetime in non-responders but not in responders. These results underscore the importance of considering PKU as a multi-faceted, multi-dimensional disorder and point to the need for additional research to delineate characteristics that predict response to treatment with BH4.
Proposed phase 2/ step 2 in-vitro test on basis of EN 14561 for standardised testing of the wound antiseptics PVP-iodine, chlorhexidine digluconate, polihexanide and octenidine dihydrochloride.[Pubmed:28193164]
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 13;17(1):143.
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no agreed standard for exploring the antimicrobial activity of wound antiseptics in a phase 2/ step 2 test protocol. In the present study, a standardised in-vitro test is proposed, which allows to test potential antiseptics in a more realistically simulation of conditions found in wounds as in a suspension test. Furthermore, factors potentially influencing test results such as type of materials used as test carrier or various compositions of organic soil challenge were investigated in detail. METHODS: This proposed phase 2/ step 2 test method was modified on basis of the EN 14561 by drying the microbial test suspension on a metal carrier for 1 h, overlaying the test wound antiseptic, washing-off, neutralization, and dispersion at serial dilutions at the end of the required exposure time yielded reproducible, consistent test results. RESULTS: The difference between the rapid onset of the antiseptic effect of PVP-I and the delayed onset especially of polihexanide was apparent. Among surface-active antimicrobial compounds, octenidine was more effective than chlorhexidine digluconate and polihexanide, with some differences depending on the test organisms. However, octenidine and PVP-I were approximately equivalent in efficiency and microbial spectrum, while polihexanide required longer exposure times or higher concentrations for a comparable antimicrobial efficacy. CONCLUSION: Overall, this method allowed testing and comparing differ liquid and gel based antimicrobial compounds in a standardised setting.
