[D-Phe12,Leu14]-Bombesin

Conformation studies on bombesin receptor antagonists: 500 MHz NMR and CD characterization of synthetic (D-Phe12, Leu14)-bombesin.[Pubmed:2545203]

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989 Jun 30;161(3):987-93.

The conformation flexibility of the tetradecapeptide hormone bombesin and its synthetic antagonist (DPhe12, Leu14)-bombesin has been studied using nuclear magnetic resonance and circular dichroism techniques. The spectral features observed indicate that the ordered structure present in the C-terminal pentapeptide moiety of native BBS is lost in the (DPhe12, Leu14) analog.

Bombesin receptor antagonists block the effects of exogenous bombesin but not of nutrients on food intake.[Pubmed:9284499]

Physiol Behav. 1997 Oct;62(4):791-8.

The endogenous, meal-contingent release of bombesin (BN)-like peptides is thought to contribute to the termination of a meal. In the following experiments the potency of BN receptor antagonists to attenuate the ability of nutrients to suppress food intake was tested. First, the effectiveness of BN receptor subtype antagonists was verified by testing their ability to block the effects of exogenous BN on food intake. Rats were administered intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of either saline or 0.1 mg/kg [D-Phe12,Leu14]BN (binds both GRP and NMB receptors), [D-Phe6]BN(6-13) ethyl amide (binds GRP > NMB), and cyclo-SS-octa (BIM-23042; binds NMB > GRP). Five minutes later rats were administered 8 micrograms/kg BN (i.p.) and milk intake was measured. Injections of [D-Phe12,Leu14]BN and [D-Phe6]BN(6-13) ethyl amide reliably attenuated the ability of BN to suppress milk intake whereas BIM-23042 was ineffective. The results show that the antagonists were behaviorally effective and that exogenous BN may exert its effects on food intake primarily through the GRP receptor subtype. Next, the antagonists were administered either 5 min prior to or 5 min after an intragastric nutrient load or no load in both overnight-deprived and nondeprived rats, and milk intake was then measured. Stomach loads reduced intake and this effect was not attenuated by BN receptor antagonists. Finally, rats were allowed to prefeed and the milk was then removed. Rats were then administered a BN receptor antagonist (0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg) or saline either immediately after the prefeed, 10 min later, or 20 min later. Milk diet was then returned and intake was measured. Peripheral injections of the BN receptor antagonist had no effect compared to saline on milk intake. Collectively, the results indicate that the blockade of peripheral Bn peptide receptors is not sufficient to attenuate the safety signals generated by stomach loads or prefeeding.

(D-Phe12) bombesin and substance P analogues function as central bombesin receptor antagonists.[Pubmed:2463692]

Synapse. 1988;2(3):282-7.

The potency of synthetic bombesin (BN) analogues with D-Phe12 substitutions and substance P analogues was investigated in the rat CNS. (D-Phe12,Leu14)BN, (D-Phe12)BN and (Tyr4,D-Phe12)BN inhibited binding to rat brain slices with IC50 values of approximately 2 microM. Similarly, spantide inhibited binding to rat brain slices with an IC50 value of 1.5 microM. Spantide inhibited specific (125I-Tyr4)BN binding as a result of decreased rate of association, whereas the rate of dissociation was unaffected. Neither the (D-Phe12)BN analogues nor the substance P analogues inhibited specific binding of 125I-VIP to rat brain slices. Central administration of BN (0.5 micrograms) induced grooming and suppressed feeding and resting. (Tyr4, D-Phe12)BN (5 micrograms) antagonized the behavioral effects of BN. Although spantide (2 micrograms) also antagonized many of the BN effects, it had intrinsic effects and hence the behavioral antagonism was not specific. These data suggest that although both (D-Phe12)BN and substance P analogues may function as central BN receptor antagonists, the (D-Phe12)BN analogues may be functionally the more useful class of antagonists.

[D-Phe12]bombesin analogues: a new class of bombesin receptor antagonists.[Pubmed:2435173]

Am J Physiol. 1987 Mar;252(3 Pt 1):G439-42.

Previous attempts to develop analogues of bombesin that function as specific receptor antagonists have been unsuccessful. Alteration of the histidine in luteinizing hormone releasing factor has resulted in analogues that function as competitive antagonists. In the present study we have used a similar strategy and altered the histidine in bombesin. [D-Phe12]bombesin, [D-Phe12,Leu14]bombesin, and [Tyr4,D-Phe12]bombesin did not stimulate amylase release from guinea pig pancreatic acini when present alone, but each analogue inhibited bombesin-stimulated secretion. For each analogue, detectable inhibition occurred at 1 microM and half-maximal inhibition at 4 microM. Each analogue inhibited amylase release by bombesin and other agonists that stimulate secretion by interacting with bombesin receptors. The analogues of bombesin did not alter stimulation by substance P or other agonists that interact with other receptors. The inhibition of the action of bombesin was competitive with Schild plots having slopes of 1.0. Each analogue also inhibited binding of 125I-labeled [Tyr4]bombesin but not 125I-labeled substance P. These results demonstrate that [D-Phe12] analogues of bombesin function as bombesin receptor antagonists and are the only bombesin receptor antagonists that interact only with the bombesin receptor. Because of their specificity, these analogues may prove useful for defining the role of bombesin in various physiological or pathological processes.