DPDPE

Selective effects of the delta-opioid receptor agonist DPDPE on consummatory successive negative contrast.[Pubmed:15839790]

Behav Neurosci. 2005 Apr;119(2):446-54.

Two experiments explored the role of the opioid system in a situation involving a surprising reduction in reward magnitude: consummatory successive negative contrast. Rats received access to 32% sucrose solution (preshift Trials 1-10) followed by 4% solution (postshift Trials 11-15). Independent groups received an injection of either the vehicle or the delta-receptor agonist [D-Ala2-,N-Me-Phe4,Gly-ol] enkephalin (DPDPE; 24 microg/kg). DPDPE attenuated the contrast effect when injected before Trial 11 but not when injected before Trial 12. An additional experiment showed that the attenuating effect of partial reinforcement on the recovery from contrast was reduced by DPDPE injections administered before nonreinforced preshift trials.

Activation of micro, delta or kappa opioid receptors by DAMGO, DPDPE, U-50488 or U-69593 respectively causes antinociception in the formalin test in the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber).[Pubmed:18929596]

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009 Feb;91(4):566-72.

Data available on the role of the opioid systems of the naked mole-rat in nociception is scanty and unique compared to that of other rodents. In the current study, the effect of DAMGO, DPDPE and U-50488 and U-69593 on formalin-induced (20 microl, 10%) nociception were investigated. Nociceptive-like behaviors were quantified by scoring in blocks of 5 min the total amount of time (s) the animal spent scratching/biting the injected paw in the early (0-5 min) and in the late (25-60 min) phase of the test. In both the early and late phases, administration of 1 or 5 mg/kg of DAMGO or DPDPE caused a naloxone-attenuated decrease in the mean scratching/biting time. U-50488 and U-69593 at all the doses tested did not significantly change the mean scratching/biting time in the early phase. However, in the late phase U-50488 or U-69593 at the highest doses tested (1 or 5 mg/kg or 0.025 or 0.05 mg/kg, respectively) caused a statistically significant and naloxone-attenuated decrease in the mean scratching/biting time. The data showed that mu, delta or kappa-selective opioids causes antinociception in the formalin test in this rodent, adding novel information on the role of opioid systems of the animal on pain regulation.

Intra-VTA deltorphin, but not DPDPE, induces place preference in ethanol-drinking rats: distinct DOR-1 and DOR-2 mechanisms control ethanol consumption and reward.[Pubmed:24033469]

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Jan;38(1):195-203.

BACKGROUND: While there is a growing body of evidence that the delta opioid receptor (DOR) modulates ethanol (EtOH) consumption, development of DOR-based medications is limited in part because there are 2 pharmacologically distinct DOR subtypes (DOR-1 and DOR-2) that can have opposing actions on behavior. METHODS: We studied the behavioral influence of the DOR-1-selective agonist [D-Pen(2) ,D-Pen(5) ]-Enkephalin (DPDPE) and the DOR-2-selective agonist deltorphin microinjected into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) on EtOH consumption and conditioned place preference (CPP) and the physiological effects of these 2 DOR agonists on GABAergic synaptic transmission in VTA-containing brain slices from Lewis rats. RESULTS: Neither deltorphin nor DPDPE induced a significant place preference in EtOH-naive Lewis rats. However, deltorphin (but not DPDPE) induced a significant CPP in EtOH-drinking rats. In contrast to the previous finding that intra-VTA DOR-1 activity inhibits EtOH consumption and that this inhibition correlates with a DPDPE-induced inhibition of GABA release, here we found no effect of DOR-2 activity on EtOH consumption nor was there a correlation between level of drinking and deltorphin-induced change in GABAergic synaptic transmission. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the therapeutic potential of DOR agonists for alcohol abuse is through a selective action at the DOR-1 form of the receptor.

[Effect of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor blockade on the immunostimulating effect of delta1 opioid receptor agonist DPDPE in mice with different psychoemotional states].[Pubmed:25826871]

Eksp Klin Farmakol. 2015;78(1):27-9.

It is established that activation of delta1 opioid receptors with their selective agonist DPDPE(100 mug/kg) significantly increases IgM immune response not only in C57BL/6J mice with unchanged psychoemotional state, but also in mice displaying aggressive or depressive-like behavior in the social stress model (10 days of agonistic confrontations). SCH-23390 (1.0 mg/kg), selective antagonist of dopamine D1 receptors, and selective D2 receptor blocker haloperidol (1 mg/kg) prevented the immunostimulating effect of DPDPE in animals not subjected to social stress. At the same time, both SCH-23390 and haloperidol did not affect DPDPE-induced immunostimulation in mice engaged in aggressive or depressive-like behaviors.

Supraspinal antinociceptive response to [D-Pen(2,5)]-enkephalin (DPDPE) is pharmacologically distinct from that to other delta-agonists in the rat.[Pubmed:11082450]

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000 Dec;295(3):1135-41.

The cloned delta-opioid receptor (DOR) is being investigated as a potential target for novel analgesics with an improved safety profile over mu-opioid receptor agonists such as morphine. The current study used antisense techniques to evaluate the role of DOR in mediating supraspinal antinociception in rats. All of the opioid agonists tested (delta-selective: deltorphin II, DPDPE, pCl-DPDPE, SNC80; mu-selective: DAMGO; i.c.v.) provided significant, dose-dependent antinociception in the paw pressure assay. Administration of a phosphodiester antisense oligonucleotide (i.c.v. ) targeted against DOR inhibited antinociception in response to SNC80, deltorphin II, and pCl-DPDPE compared with mismatch and saline-treated controls. However, antisense treatment did not inhibit the response to DPDPE or DAMGO. In contrast, the highly selective mu-antagonist CTOP blocked antinociception in response to ED(80) concentrations of DAMGO and DPDPE, reduced the response to pCl-DPDPE, and did not alter the response to deltorphin II or SNC80. In total, these data suggest that DOR mediates the antinociceptive response to deltorphin II, SNC80, and pCl-DPDPE at supraspinal sites and further demonstrates that the DOR-mediated response to deltorphin II and SNC80 is independent of mu-receptor activation. Conversely, supraspinal antinociception in response to DPDPE is mediated by a receptor distinct from DOR; this response is directly or indirectly sensitive to mu-receptor blockade. The distinct pharmacological profile of DPDPE suggests that either this prototypical delta-agonist mediates antinociception by a direct, nonselective interaction at mu-receptors or DPDPE interacts with a novel delta-subtype that, in turn, indirectly activates mu-receptors in the brain.

Analogs of the delta opioid receptor selective cyclic peptide [2-D-penicillamine,5-D-penicillamine]-enkephalin: 2',6'-dimethyltyrosine and Gly3-Phe4 amide bond isostere substitutions.[Pubmed:1323677]

J Med Chem. 1992 Aug 7;35(16):2928-38.

In order to develop systemically-active opioid peptides, the delta-selective, opioid pentapeptide [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]-enkephalin (DPDPE) was modified by esterification and by substitution of 2',6'-dimethyltyrosine for tyrosine to yield 4. Compound 4 was on the order of 8- and 800-fold more active than DPDPE in both delta and mu opioid radioligand binding assays, respectively, in rat neural membrane suspensions. Compound 4 was considerably more potent than DPDPE at inhibiting contractions of electrically-stimulated mouse vas deferens in vitro, and this effect was very sensitive to naltrindole, a delta-selective opioid antagonist. These observations can be taken as indication that 4 exerts its effects through delta opioid receptors. This interpretation is supported by the finding that the EC50 value of 4 derived in the smooth muscle assay is very similar to that derived in NG108-15 neuroblastoma cells, a preparation devoid of mu receptors. Unlike DPDPE, 4 exhibited significant, naloxone-sensitive, antinociceptive activity when administered systemically, as measured by inhibition of phenylbenzquinone-induced stretching in mice (ED50 = 2.1 mg/kg). Compound 4 also displayed significant antinociceptive activity following systemic administration as measured by its action in mice to increase latencies for tail withdrawal from radiant heat (ED50 = 50 mg/kg). Compound 4 did not produce morphine-like discriminative stimulus effects in rats trained to discriminate 3.0 mg/kg morphine from vehicle at doses ranging from 30 to 120 mg/kg. This observation can be interpreted as indication that within this dosage range there is an absence of morphine-like subjective effects. Physical dependence, however, could be induced in mice at higher doses of 4 under a progressively-graded, 4-day dose regimen. Congeners of 4 with amide bond surrogates for the Gly-Phe amide bond (oxymethylene, trans-double bond, and bismethylene isosteres) in the cyclic core of DPDPE were prepared in an attempt to increase the antinociceptive activity of 4. While some of the congeners were active in the in vitro assays, they did not display significant antinociceptive activity following systemic administration. The preparation of all the compounds was accomplished by solution-phase methods. The mechanisms which might underlie the biological and systemic activity of 4 are discussed.