OndansetronCAS# 99614-02-5 |
- Iloperidone hydrochloride
Catalog No.:BCC4212
CAS No.:1299470-39-5
- Prucalopride
Catalog No.:BCC5055
CAS No.:179474-81-8
- LY310762
Catalog No.:BCC5052
CAS No.:192927-92-7
- SB271046
Catalog No.:BCC5057
CAS No.:209481-20-9
- Desvenlafaxine Succinate
Catalog No.:BCC5048
CAS No.:386750-22-7
- Desvenlafaxine
Catalog No.:BCC5038
CAS No.:93413-62-8
Quality Control & MSDS
Number of papers citing our products
Chemical structure
3D structure
Cas No. | 99614-02-5 | SDF | Download SDF |
PubChem ID | 4595 | Appearance | Powder |
Formula | C18H19N3O | M.Wt | 293.36 |
Type of Compound | N/A | Storage | Desiccate at -20°C |
Solubility | DMSO : 10 mg/mL (34.09 mM; Need ultrasonic) H2O : < 0.1 mg/mL (insoluble) | ||
Chemical Name | 9-methyl-3-[(2-methylimidazol-1-yl)methyl]-2,3-dihydro-1H-carbazol-4-one | ||
SMILES | CC1=NC=CN1CC2CCC3=C(C2=O)C4=CC=CC=C4N3C | ||
Standard InChIKey | FELGMEQIXOGIFQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N | ||
Standard InChI | InChI=1S/C18H19N3O/c1-12-19-9-10-21(12)11-13-7-8-16-17(18(13)22)14-5-3-4-6-15(14)20(16)2/h3-6,9-10,13H,7-8,11H2,1-2H3 | ||
General tips | For obtaining a higher solubility , please warm the tube at 37 ℃ and shake it in the ultrasonic bath for a while.Stock solution can be stored below -20℃ for several months. We recommend that you prepare and use the solution on the same day. However, if the test schedule requires, the stock solutions can be prepared in advance, and the stock solution must be sealed and stored below -20℃. In general, the stock solution can be kept for several months. Before use, we recommend that you leave the vial at room temperature for at least an hour before opening it. |
||
About Packaging | 1. The packaging of the product may be reversed during transportation, cause the high purity compounds to adhere to the neck or cap of the vial.Take the vail out of its packaging and shake gently until the compounds fall to the bottom of the vial. 2. For liquid products, please centrifuge at 500xg to gather the liquid to the bottom of the vial. 3. Try to avoid loss or contamination during the experiment. |
||
Shipping Condition | Packaging according to customer requirements(5mg, 10mg, 20mg and more). Ship via FedEx, DHL, UPS, EMS or other couriers with RT, or blue ice upon request. |
Ondansetron Dilution Calculator
Ondansetron Molarity Calculator
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | 20 mg | 25 mg | |
1 mM | 3.4088 mL | 17.0439 mL | 34.0878 mL | 68.1756 mL | 85.2195 mL |
5 mM | 0.6818 mL | 3.4088 mL | 6.8176 mL | 13.6351 mL | 17.0439 mL |
10 mM | 0.3409 mL | 1.7044 mL | 3.4088 mL | 6.8176 mL | 8.522 mL |
50 mM | 0.0682 mL | 0.3409 mL | 0.6818 mL | 1.3635 mL | 1.7044 mL |
100 mM | 0.0341 mL | 0.1704 mL | 0.3409 mL | 0.6818 mL | 0.8522 mL |
* Note: If you are in the process of experiment, it's necessary to make the dilution ratios of the samples. The dilution data above is only for reference. Normally, it's can get a better solubility within lower of Concentrations. |
Calcutta University
University of Minnesota
University of Maryland School of Medicine
University of Illinois at Chicago
The Ohio State University
University of Zurich
Harvard University
Colorado State University
Auburn University
Yale University
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Washington State University
Stanford University
University of Leipzig
Universidade da Beira Interior
The Institute of Cancer Research
Heidelberg University
University of Amsterdam
University of Auckland
TsingHua University
The University of Michigan
Miami University
DRURY University
Jilin University
Fudan University
Wuhan University
Sun Yat-sen University
Universite de Paris
Deemed University
Auckland University
The University of Tokyo
Korea University
Ondansetron(GR38032) is a serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonist used mainly as anantiemetic (to treat nausea and vomiting), often following chemotherapy.
- Ondansetron HCl
Catalog No.:BCC2493
CAS No.:99614-01-4
- Sertaconazole nitrate
Catalog No.:BCC4716
CAS No.:99592-39-9
- Sertaconazole
Catalog No.:BCC9146
CAS No.:99592-32-2
- Neuropeptide FF
Catalog No.:BCC5983
CAS No.:99566-27-5
- K 252a
Catalog No.:BCC7152
CAS No.:99533-80-9
- L-651,582
Catalog No.:BCC7561
CAS No.:99519-84-3
- 3-Ethoxy-4-ethoxycarbonyl phenylacetic acid
Catalog No.:BCC8629
CAS No.:99469-99-5
- 1-Chloroethyl cyclohexyl carbonate
Catalog No.:BCC8463
CAS No.:99464-83-2
- Ampiroxicam
Catalog No.:BCC4426
CAS No.:99464-64-9
- BTZO 1
Catalog No.:BCC7886
CAS No.:99420-15-2
- Methyl rosmarinate
Catalog No.:BCN4536
CAS No.:99353-00-1
- Kadsurin A
Catalog No.:BCN6515
CAS No.:99340-07-5
- Leucanthogenin
Catalog No.:BCN7932
CAS No.:99615-00-6
- Isothymonin
Catalog No.:BCN3393
CAS No.:99615-01-7
- Kazinol B
Catalog No.:BCN4538
CAS No.:99624-27-8
- Kazinol A
Catalog No.:BCN3388
CAS No.:99624-28-9
- ent-3beta,18-Dihydroxylabda-8(17),13E-dien-15-oic acid
Catalog No.:BCN7669
CAS No.:99624-39-2
- Uncinatone
Catalog No.:BCN4547
CAS No.:99624-92-7
- Ro 19-4603
Catalog No.:BCC7228
CAS No.:99632-94-7
- 14-Benzoylneoline
Catalog No.:BCN6493
CAS No.:99633-05-3
- Scholaricine
Catalog No.:BCN4539
CAS No.:99694-90-3
- Rotigotine
Catalog No.:BCC1907
CAS No.:99755-59-6
- Droxinostat
Catalog No.:BCC2157
CAS No.:99873-43-5
- Kaempferol 3-O-arabinoside
Catalog No.:BCN4541
CAS No.:99882-10-7
Efficacy of ondansetron for the prevention of propofol injection pain: a meta-analysis.[Pubmed:28260943]
J Pain Res. 2017 Feb 21;10:445-450.
AIM: This review was performed to investigate the effect of Ondansetron on the prevention of propofol injection pain. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Ondansetron in preventing the pain on injection of propofol. Then, RevMan 5.2 was adopted to conduct a meta-analysis on propofol injection pain. RESULTS: Ten RCTs, totaling 782 patients, were included in this analysis. The meta-analysis showed that: 1) compared with the control group, the Ondansetron group was related to a decreasing incidence of propofol injection pain, and it was statistically significant (risk ratio [RR] = 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI, 0.34, 0.49], P < 0.00001); 2) compared with the incidence of propofol injection pain in the lidocaine group, there was no difference and no statistical significance (RR = 1.28, 95% CI [0.85, 1.93], P = 0.25); 3) no statistically significant differences were found between the Ondansetron and magnesium sulfate groups in the incidence of propofol injection pain (RR = 1.20, 95% CI [0.87, 1.66], P = 0.27); and 4) the incidence of Ondansetron group igniting moderate pain (RR = 0.37, 95% CI [0.26, 0.52], P < 0.00001) and severe pain (RR = 0.27, 95% CI [0.17, 0.43] P < 0.00001) was less likely to occur during the injection of propofol compared with the control group, but there was no difference between the Ondansetron and control groups in the incidence of mild propofol injection pain (RR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.63, 1.10], P = 0.20). CONCLUSION: Ondansetron can effectively prevent propofol injection pain, and the effect is similar to that of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine.
Efficacy of Risperidone Augmentation with Ondansetron in the Treatment of Negative and Depressive Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.[Pubmed:28293046]
Iran J Med Sci. 2017 Jan;42(1):14-23.
BACKGROUND: Given the potential role of the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia, this study was performed to determine whether Ondansetron plus risperidone could reduce the negative and depressive symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. METHODS: In a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial (IRCT registration # 201112125280N7), in 2012-2013 in Mashhad, Iran, 38 patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia received risperidone either combined with a fixed dose (4-8 mg/d) of Ondansetron (n=18) or with a placebo (n=20) for 12 weeks. The patients were evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Wechsler's Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R), and Hamilton's Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) at baseline and 12 weeks later. Changes in the inventories were used to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. The t test, Chi-square test, and SPSS (version 16) were used to analyze the data. The statistical significance was set atP<0.05. RESULTS: Ondansetron plus risperidone was associated with a significantly larger improvement in the PANSS overall scale and subscales for negative symptoms and cognition than was risperidone plus placebo (P<0.001). The WAIS-R scale results indicated significant differences between the 2 groups before and after administrating the medicine and the placebo. The administration of Ondansetron significantly improved visual memory based on the subtests of the WAIS (P<0.05). Ondansetron had no positive effects on depressive symptoms (effect size=0.13). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that Ondansetron, as an adjunct treatment, reduces negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and can be used as a potential adjunctive strategy particularly for negative symptoms and cognitive impairments. Trial Registration Number: IRCT201112125280N7.
A Comparative Evaluation of Ramosetron with Ondansetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Urological Procedures.[Pubmed:28298761]
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):78-83.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common problem causing distress to patients in the postoperative period. Younger age, gynecological surgeries, laparoscopic surgeries, female gender, volatile anesthetics, increased duration of anesthesia, and postoperative opioid use are associated with increased incidence of PONV. AIM: The present study was conducted to study the efficacy of ramosetron and its comparison with Ondansetron in the prevention of PONV in patients undergoing pyelolithotomy, pyeloplasty, and upper ureterolithotomy. METHODS: One hundred patients with physical status American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II, aged 20-60 years were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly distributed to receive either injection ramosetron 0.3 mg intravenously (IV) or injection Ondansetron 6 mg IV just before extubation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in age, gender, weight, duration of anesthesia, and duration of surgery. In the patients, who received ramosetron, it was observed that incidence of the episodes of nausea and vomiting increased with time after surgery. Each patient had an episode of nausea and an episode of vomiting during the 6-12 h interval. Similarly, two patients had episodes of nausea and two patients had episodes of vomiting at 18-24 h. This necessitated the increased need for rescue antiemetics with a total of four patients needing rescue antiemetics at 18-24 h. In patients receiving Ondansetron, the episodes of nausea were more in number when compared with the ramosetron group. Twelve patients complained of nausea and thirteen patients had episodes of vomiting with the needfor rescue antiemetic in 14 patients. Both genders had a comparable incidence of nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION: A single dose of IV ramosetron (0.3 mg) is more effective when compared with a single dose IV Ondansetron (6 mg) in the prevention of PONV. We observed that the benefit was more in the later stages of the postoperative period (12-24 h).
The Effect of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone on Nausea and Vomiting under Spinal Anesthesia.[Pubmed:28289619]
World J Plast Surg. 2017 Jan;6(1):88-93.
BACKGROUND: During abdominal surgery under regional anesthesia, nausea may happen due to several contributing factors. This study compared the effects of Ondansetron and dexamethasone on nausea and vomiting under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients of 15 to 35 years old with ASA class I and II were enrolled. Before administering either Ondansetron or dexamethasone, blood pressure and heart rate of the patients were recorded. The patients received 70 mg of 5% lidocaine for spinal anesthesia. Patients who received 6 mg of Ondansetron were considered as group A, while group B received 8 mg of dexamethasone. The level of nausea and vomiting, blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate of each patient was measured at 1, 5, 10, 15 and 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia and during recovery (every 5 minutes). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between nausea and vomiting between the two groups after spinal anesthesia within the first and fifth minutes. There was no significant difference between nausea and vomiting between the two groups within 10, 15 and 30 minutes and during recovery at 5, 10, 15 and 30 minutes. CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone and Ondansetron were shown to equally reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting under spinal anesthesia and can be recommended as a good choice for prevention of nausea and vomiting during surgeries.