SucroseCAS# 57-50-1 |
2D Structure
Quality Control & MSDS
3D structure
Package In Stock
Number of papers citing our products
Cas No. | 57-50-1 | SDF | Download SDF |
PubChem ID | 5988 | Appearance | Powder |
Formula | C12H22O11 | M.Wt | 342.3 |
Type of Compound | Saccharides | Storage | Desiccate at -20°C |
Solubility | H2O : 100 mg/mL (292.14 mM; Need ultrasonic and warming) DMSO : 100 mg/mL (292.14 mM; Need ultrasonic) | ||
Chemical Name | (2R,3R,4S,5S,6R)-2-[(2S,3S,4S,5R)-3,4-dihydroxy-2,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-2-yl]oxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-3,4,5-triol | ||
SMILES | C(C1C(C(C(C(O1)OC2(C(C(C(O2)CO)O)O)CO)O)O)O)O | ||
Standard InChIKey | CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N | ||
Standard InChI | InChI=1S/C12H22O11/c13-1-4-6(16)8(18)9(19)11(21-4)23-12(3-15)10(20)7(17)5(2-14)22-12/h4-11,13-20H,1-3H2/t4-,5-,6-,7-,8+,9-,10+,11-,12+/m1/s1 | ||
General tips | For obtaining a higher solubility , please warm the tube at 37 ℃ and shake it in the ultrasonic bath for a while.Stock solution can be stored below -20℃ for several months. We recommend that you prepare and use the solution on the same day. However, if the test schedule requires, the stock solutions can be prepared in advance, and the stock solution must be sealed and stored below -20℃. In general, the stock solution can be kept for several months. Before use, we recommend that you leave the vial at room temperature for at least an hour before opening it. |
||
About Packaging | 1. The packaging of the product may be reversed during transportation, cause the high purity compounds to adhere to the neck or cap of the vial.Take the vail out of its packaging and shake gently until the compounds fall to the bottom of the vial. 2. For liquid products, please centrifuge at 500xg to gather the liquid to the bottom of the vial. 3. Try to avoid loss or contamination during the experiment. |
||
Shipping Condition | Packaging according to customer requirements(5mg, 10mg, 20mg and more). Ship via FedEx, DHL, UPS, EMS or other couriers with RT, or blue ice upon request. |
Description | Sucrose is used extensively as a food and a sweetener, it is the most efficient large-scale crop capable of supplying sufficient carbon substrate, in the form of Sucrose, needed during fermentative feedstock production. |
In vitro | Escherichia coli W shows fast, highly oxidative sucrose metabolism and low acetate formation.[Pubmed: 25125039]Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Nov;98(21):9033-44.Sugarcane is the most efficient large-scale crop capable of supplying sufficient carbon substrate, in the form of Sucrose, needed during fermentative feedstock production. However, Sucrose metabolism in Escherichia coli is not well understood because the two most common strains, E. coli K-12 and B, do not grow on Sucrose.
Metabolic activity of Streptococcus mutans biofilms and gene expression during exposure to xylitol and sucrose.[Pubmed: 25059251]Int J Oral Sci. 2014 Dec;6(4):195-204.The objective of the study was to analyse Streptococcus mutans biofilms grown under different dietary conditions by using multifaceted methodological approaches to gain deeper insight into the cariogenic impact of carbohydrates.
|
Kinase Assay | Behavioral and circuit basis of sucrose rejection by Drosophila females in a simple decision-making task.[Pubmed: 25632118]J Neurosci. 2015 Jan 28;35(4):1396-410.Drosophila melanogaster egg-laying site selection offers a genetic model to study a simple form of value-based decision. We have previously shown that Drosophila females consistently reject a Sucrose-containing substrate and choose a plain (Sucrose-free) substrate for egg laying in our Sucrose versus plain decision assay. However, either substrate is accepted when it is the sole option. Here we describe the neural mechanism that underlies females' Sucrose rejection in our Sucrose versus plain assay.
|
Sucrose Dilution Calculator
Sucrose Molarity Calculator
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | 20 mg | 25 mg | |
1 mM | 2.9214 mL | 14.6071 mL | 29.2141 mL | 58.4283 mL | 73.0353 mL |
5 mM | 0.5843 mL | 2.9214 mL | 5.8428 mL | 11.6857 mL | 14.6071 mL |
10 mM | 0.2921 mL | 1.4607 mL | 2.9214 mL | 5.8428 mL | 7.3035 mL |
50 mM | 0.0584 mL | 0.2921 mL | 0.5843 mL | 1.1686 mL | 1.4607 mL |
100 mM | 0.0292 mL | 0.1461 mL | 0.2921 mL | 0.5843 mL | 0.7304 mL |
* Note: If you are in the process of experiment, it's necessary to make the dilution ratios of the samples. The dilution data above is only for reference. Normally, it's can get a better solubility within lower of Concentrations. |
Calcutta University
University of Minnesota
University of Maryland School of Medicine
University of Illinois at Chicago
The Ohio State University
University of Zurich
Harvard University
Colorado State University
Auburn University
Yale University
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Washington State University
Stanford University
University of Leipzig
Universidade da Beira Interior
The Institute of Cancer Research
Heidelberg University
University of Amsterdam
University of Auckland
TsingHua University
The University of Michigan
Miami University
DRURY University
Jilin University
Fudan University
Wuhan University
Sun Yat-sen University
Universite de Paris
Deemed University
Auckland University
The University of Tokyo
Korea University
- Fructose
Catalog No.:BCN4969
CAS No.:57-48-7
- Esromiotin
Catalog No.:BCC8325
CAS No.:57-47-6
- Phenytoin
Catalog No.:BCC5070
CAS No.:57-41-0
- Benactyzine hydrochloride
Catalog No.:BCC8841
CAS No.:57-37-4
- Pentobarbital sodium salt
Catalog No.:BCC6231
CAS No.:57-33-0
- Phenobarbital sodium salt
Catalog No.:BCC6230
CAS No.:57-30-7
- Strychnine
Catalog No.:BCN4978
CAS No.:57-24-9
- Vincristine
Catalog No.:BCN5411
CAS No.:57-22-7
- Urea
Catalog No.:BCC8034
CAS No.:57-13-6
- Stearic Acid
Catalog No.:BCN3820
CAS No.:57-11-4
- Palmitic acid
Catalog No.:BCN1206
CAS No.:57-10-3
- Flupirtine
Catalog No.:BCC4282
CAS No.:56995-20-1
- Chlorotetracycline
Catalog No.:BCC8913
CAS No.:57-62-5
- Ethinyl Estradiol
Catalog No.:BCC3777
CAS No.:57-63-6
- Probenecid
Catalog No.:BCC4832
CAS No.:57-66-9
- Sulfaguanidine
Catalog No.:BCC4727
CAS No.:57-67-0
- Sulfamethazine
Catalog No.:BCC4942
CAS No.:57-68-1
- Progesterone
Catalog No.:BCN2198
CAS No.:57-83-0
- Testosterone propionate
Catalog No.:BCC9172
CAS No.:57-85-2
- Ergosterol
Catalog No.:BCN5787
CAS No.:57-87-4
- Cholesterol
Catalog No.:BCN2199
CAS No.:57-88-5
- α-Estradiol
Catalog No.:BCC7497
CAS No.:57-91-0
- (+)-Tubocurarine chloride
Catalog No.:BCC7496
CAS No.:57-94-3
- Europine
Catalog No.:BCN1976
CAS No.:570-19-4
Escherichia coli W shows fast, highly oxidative sucrose metabolism and low acetate formation.[Pubmed:25125039]
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Nov;98(21):9033-44.
Sugarcane is the most efficient large-scale crop capable of supplying sufficient carbon substrate, in the form of Sucrose, needed during fermentative feedstock production. However, Sucrose metabolism in Escherichia coli is not well understood because the two most common strains, E. coli K-12 and B, do not grow on Sucrose. Here, using a Sucrose utilizing strain, E. coli W, we undertake an in-depth comparison of Sucrose and glucose metabolism including growth kinetics, metabolite profiling, microarray-based transcriptome analysis, labelling-based proteomic analysis and (13)C-fluxomics. While E. coli W grew comparably well on Sucrose and glucose integration of the omics, datasets showed that during growth on each carbon source, metabolism was distinct. The metabolism was generally derepressed on Sucrose, and significant flux rearrangements were observed in central carbon metabolism. These included a reduction in the flux of the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway branch, an increase in the tricarboxylic acid cycle flux and a reduction in the glyoxylate shunt flux due to the dephosphorylation of isocitrate dehydrogenase. But unlike growth on other sugars that induce cAMP-dependent Crp regulation, the phosphoenol-pyruvate-glyoxylate cycle was not active on Sucrose. Lower acetate accumulation was also observed in Sucrose compared to glucose cultures. This was linked to induction of the acetate catabolic genes actP and acs and independent of the glyoxylic shunt. Overall, the cells stayed highly oxidative. In summary, Sucrose metabolism was fast, efficient and led to low acetate accumulation making it an ideal carbon source for industrial fermentation with E. coli W.
Injectable colloidal gold in a sucrose acetate isobutyrate gelating matrix with potential use in radiation therapy.[Pubmed:24733773]
Adv Healthc Mater. 2014 Oct;3(10):1680-7.
External beam radiation therapy relies on the ability to deliver high radiation doses to tumor cells with minimal exposure to surrounding healthy tissue. Advanced irradiation techniques, including image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), rely on the ability to locate tumors to optimize the therapeutic benefit of these techniques. Today, radiopaque fiducial tissue markers are placed in or around tumors, for example, in prostate cancer patients to enhance the precision of daily and/or real-time IGRT. A liquid injectable fiducial marker (nanogel) is developed based on PEGylated gold nanoparticles and Sucrose acetate isobutyrate (SAIB) with improved properties compared to current solid fiducial markers. The developed nanogel is investigated in vitro and subsequently evaluated in vivo in immunocompetent NMRI mice. The nanogel shows high CT-contrast and excellent stability in vivo over a period of 12 weeks. The nanogel is found to be biocompatible and well tolerated. No induction of the inflammatory cytokines INF-gamma, IL-6, or TNF-alpha is observed throughout the study period. The developed nanogel seems to be a safe injectable fiducial marker ideally suited for IGRT that may further enhance the effect of radiation.
Metabolic activity of Streptococcus mutans biofilms and gene expression during exposure to xylitol and sucrose.[Pubmed:25059251]
Int J Oral Sci. 2014 Dec;6(4):195-204.
The objective of the study was to analyse Streptococcus mutans biofilms grown under different dietary conditions by using multifaceted methodological approaches to gain deeper insight into the cariogenic impact of carbohydrates. S. mutans biofilms were generated during a period of 24 h in the following media: Schaedler broth as a control medium containing endogenous glucose, Schaedler broth with an additional 5% Sucrose, and Schaedler broth supplemented with 1% xylitol. The confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)-based analyses of the microbial vitality, respiratory activity (5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride, CTC) and production of extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) were performed separately in the inner, middle and outer biofilm layers. In addition to the microbiological sample testing, the glucose/Sucrose consumption of the biofilm bacteria was quantified, and the expression of glucosyltransferases and other biofilm-associated genes was investigated. Xylitol exposure did not inhibit the viability of S. mutans biofilms, as monitored by the following experimental parameters: culture growth, vitality, CTC activity and EPS production. However, xylitol exposure caused a difference in gene expression compared to the control. GtfC was upregulated only in the presence of xylitol. Under xylitol exposure, gtfB was upregulated by a factor of 6, while under Sucrose exposure, it was upregulated by a factor of three. Compared with glucose and xylitol, Sucrose increased cell vitality in all biofilm layers. In all nutrient media, the intrinsic glucose was almost completely consumed by the cells of the S. mutans biofilm within 24 h. After 24 h of biofilm formation, the multiparametric measurements showed that xylitol in the presence of glucose caused predominantly genotypic differences but did not induce metabolic differences compared to the control. Thus, the availability of dietary carbohydrates in either a pure or combined form seems to affect the cariogenic potential of S. mutans biofilms.
Behavioral and circuit basis of sucrose rejection by Drosophila females in a simple decision-making task.[Pubmed:25632118]
J Neurosci. 2015 Jan 28;35(4):1396-410.
Drosophila melanogaster egg-laying site selection offers a genetic model to study a simple form of value-based decision. We have previously shown that Drosophila females consistently reject a Sucrose-containing substrate and choose a plain (Sucrose-free) substrate for egg laying in our Sucrose versus plain decision assay. However, either substrate is accepted when it is the sole option. Here we describe the neural mechanism that underlies females' Sucrose rejection in our Sucrose versus plain assay. First, we demonstrate that females explored the Sucrose substrate frequently before most egg-laying events, suggesting that they actively suppress laying eggs on the Sucrose substrate as opposed to avoiding visits to it. Second, we show that activating a specific subset of DA neurons triggered a preference for laying eggs on the Sucrose substrate over the plain one, suggesting that activating these DA neurons can increase the value of the Sucrose substrate for egg laying. Third, we demonstrate that neither ablating nor inhibiting the mushroom body (MB), a known Drosophila learning and decision center, affected females' egg-laying preferences in our Sucrose versus plain assay, suggesting that MB does not mediate this specific decision-making task. We propose that the value of a Sucrose substrate- as an egg-laying option-can be adjusted by the activities of a specific DA circuit. Once the Sucrose substrate is determined to be the lesser valued option, females execute their decision to reject this inferior substrate not by stopping their visits to it, but by actively suppressing their egg-laying motor program during their visits.