Cannabidiolic acidCAS# 1244-58-2 |
Quality Control & MSDS
Number of papers citing our products
Chemical structure
3D structure
Cas No. | 1244-58-2 | SDF | Download SDF |
PubChem ID | 160570 | Appearance | Powder |
Formula | C22H30O4 | M.Wt | 358.5 |
Type of Compound | Phenols | Storage | Desiccate at -20°C |
Solubility | Soluble in Chloroform,Dichloromethane,Ethyl Acetate,DMSO,Acetone,etc. | ||
Chemical Name | 2,4-dihydroxy-3-[(1R,6R)-3-methyl-6-prop-1-en-2-ylcyclohex-2-en-1-yl]-6-pentylbenzoic acid | ||
SMILES | CCCCCC1=CC(=C(C(=C1C(=O)O)O)C2C=C(CCC2C(=C)C)C)O | ||
Standard InChIKey | WVOLTBSCXRRQFR-DLBZAZTESA-N | ||
Standard InChI | InChI=1S/C22H30O4/c1-5-6-7-8-15-12-18(23)20(21(24)19(15)22(25)26)17-11-14(4)9-10-16(17)13(2)3/h11-12,16-17,23-24H,2,5-10H2,1,3-4H3,(H,25,26)/t16-,17+/m0/s1 | ||
General tips | For obtaining a higher solubility , please warm the tube at 37 ℃ and shake it in the ultrasonic bath for a while.Stock solution can be stored below -20℃ for several months. We recommend that you prepare and use the solution on the same day. However, if the test schedule requires, the stock solutions can be prepared in advance, and the stock solution must be sealed and stored below -20℃. In general, the stock solution can be kept for several months. Before use, we recommend that you leave the vial at room temperature for at least an hour before opening it. |
||
About Packaging | 1. The packaging of the product may be reversed during transportation, cause the high purity compounds to adhere to the neck or cap of the vial.Take the vail out of its packaging and shake gently until the compounds fall to the bottom of the vial. 2. For liquid products, please centrifuge at 500xg to gather the liquid to the bottom of the vial. 3. Try to avoid loss or contamination during the experiment. |
||
Shipping Condition | Packaging according to customer requirements(5mg, 10mg, 20mg and more). Ship via FedEx, DHL, UPS, EMS or other couriers with RT, or blue ice upon request. |
Description | 1. Cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) inhibits migration of the highly invasive MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells, apparently through a mechanism involving inhibition of cAMP-dependent protein kinase A, coupled with an activation of the small GTPase, RhoA; it offers potential therapeutic modality in the abrogation of cancer cell migration, including aggressive breast cancers. 2. Cannabidiolic acid displays significantly greater potency at inhibiting vomiting in shrews and nausea in rats, and at enhancing 5-HT(1A) receptor activation, an action that accounts for its ability to attenuate conditioned gaping in rats. 3. Cannabidiolic acid selectively inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 activity with an IC(50) value around 2 microM, has 9-fold higher selectivity than COX-1 inhibition. 4. Cannabidiolic acid and cannabidiol have inhibitory actions on the intestines of S. murinus that are not neuronallymediated or mediated via CB1 or CB2 receptors. |
Targets | cAMP | COX | 5-HT Receptor |
Cannabidiolic acid Dilution Calculator
Cannabidiolic acid Molarity Calculator
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | 20 mg | 25 mg | |
1 mM | 2.7894 mL | 13.947 mL | 27.894 mL | 55.788 mL | 69.735 mL |
5 mM | 0.5579 mL | 2.7894 mL | 5.5788 mL | 11.1576 mL | 13.947 mL |
10 mM | 0.2789 mL | 1.3947 mL | 2.7894 mL | 5.5788 mL | 6.9735 mL |
50 mM | 0.0558 mL | 0.2789 mL | 0.5579 mL | 1.1158 mL | 1.3947 mL |
100 mM | 0.0279 mL | 0.1395 mL | 0.2789 mL | 0.5579 mL | 0.6974 mL |
* Note: If you are in the process of experiment, it's necessary to make the dilution ratios of the samples. The dilution data above is only for reference. Normally, it's can get a better solubility within lower of Concentrations. |
Calcutta University
University of Minnesota
University of Maryland School of Medicine
University of Illinois at Chicago
The Ohio State University
University of Zurich
Harvard University
Colorado State University
Auburn University
Yale University
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Washington State University
Stanford University
University of Leipzig
Universidade da Beira Interior
The Institute of Cancer Research
Heidelberg University
University of Amsterdam
University of Auckland
TsingHua University
The University of Michigan
Miami University
DRURY University
Jilin University
Fudan University
Wuhan University
Sun Yat-sen University
Universite de Paris
Deemed University
Auckland University
The University of Tokyo
Korea University
- MG 149
Catalog No.:BCC5149
CAS No.:1243583-85-8
- 9-(1H-Benzotriazol-1-ylmethyl)-9H-carbazole
Catalog No.:BCC8792
CAS No.:124337-34-4
- Lenalidomide hydrochloride
Catalog No.:BCC1697
CAS No.:1243329-97-6
- Paucinervin A
Catalog No.:BCN7308
CAS No.:1243249-16-2
- LGK-974
Catalog No.:BCC5103
CAS No.:1243244-14-5
- Wnt-C59
Catalog No.:BCC3965
CAS No.:1243243-89-1
- RN486
Catalog No.:BCC3921
CAS No.:1242156-23-5
- 12-Ursene-3,16,22-triol
Catalog No.:BCN6126
CAS No.:1242085-06-8
- Laxiracemosin H
Catalog No.:BCN6910
CAS No.:1241871-28-2
- 6-O-Vanilloylajugol
Catalog No.:BCN6125
CAS No.:124168-04-3
- (R)-DRF053 dihydrochloride
Catalog No.:BCC7726
CAS No.:1241675-76-2
- Alcesefoliside
Catalog No.:BCN2933
CAS No.:124151-38-8
- CGS 21680 HCl
Catalog No.:BCC4316
CAS No.:124431-80-7
- VU 0364739 hydrochloride
Catalog No.:BCC7875
CAS No.:1244640-48-9
- 16R-sitsirikine
Catalog No.:BCN3492
CAS No.:1245-00-7
- 2,2'-Bicinchoninic acid
Catalog No.:BCC8487
CAS No.:1245-13-2
- Retusin
Catalog No.:BCN7794
CAS No.:1245-15-4
- 16-Oxoalisol A
Catalog No.:BCN3460
CAS No.:124515-98-6
- PI4KIII beta inhibitor 3
Catalog No.:BCC1310
CAS No.:1245319-54-3
- Glucocorticoid receptor agonist
Catalog No.:BCC1596
CAS No.:1245526-82-2
- NVP-BGT226
Catalog No.:BCC3827
CAS No.:1245537-68-1
- GR 79236
Catalog No.:BCC7215
CAS No.:124555-18-6
- ent-Labda-8(17),13Z-diene-15,16,19-triol 19-O-glucoside
Catalog No.:BCN1598
CAS No.:1245636-01-4
- Brain natriuretic peptide (1-32) (human)
Catalog No.:BCC6034
CAS No.:124584-08-3
Effect of low doses of cannabidiolic acid and ondansetron on LiCl-induced conditioned gaping (a model of nausea-induced behaviour) in rats.[Pubmed:23488964]
Br J Pharmacol. 2013 Jun;169(3):685-92.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the minimally effective dose of Cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) that effectively reduces lithium chloride (LiCl)-induced conditioned gaping reactions (nausea-induced behaviour) in rats and to determine if these low systemic doses of CBDA (5-0.1 mug.kg(-)(1)) relative to those of CBD could potentiate the anti-nausea effects of the classic 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonist, ondansetron (OND). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We investigated the efficacy of low doses of CBDA to suppress acute nausea, assessed by the establishment of conditioned gaping to a LiCl-paired flavour in rats. The potential of threshold and subthreshold doses of CBDA to enhance the reduction of nausea-induced conditioned gaping by OND were then determined. KEY RESULTS: CBDA (at doses as low as 0.5 mug.kg(-)(1)) suppressed nausea-induced conditioned gaping to a flavour. A low dose of OND (1.0 mug.kg(-)(1)) alone reduced nausea-induced conditioned gaping, but when it was combined with a subthreshold dose of CBDA (0.1 mug.kg(-)(1)) there was an enhancement in the suppression of LiCl-induced conditioned gaping. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CBDA potently reduced conditioned gaping in rats, even at low doses and enhanced the anti-nausea effect of a low dose of OND. These findings suggest that combining low doses of CBDA and OND will more effectively treat acute nausea in chemotherapy patients.
Suppression of lithium chloride-induced conditioned gaping (a model of nausea-induced behaviour) in rats (using the taste reactivity test) with metoclopramide is enhanced by cannabidiolic acid.[Pubmed:24012649]
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2013 Oct;111:84-9.
We aimed to determine the potential of various doses of metoclopramide (MCP, a dopamine antagonist) to reduce lithium chloride (LiCl)-induced conditioned gaping (a nausea-induced behaviour) in rats, using the taste reactivity test. We then evaluated whether an ineffective low dose of Cannabidiolic acid (CBDA, 0.1 mug/kg, Rock and Parker, 2013), the potent acidic precursor of cannabidiol (CBD, a non-psychoactive component of cannabis) could enhance the anti-nausea effects of an ineffective low dose of MCP. MCP (3.0 mg/kg) reduced conditioned gaping responses. Coadministration of ineffective doses of MCP (0.3 mg/kg) and CBDA (0.1 mug/kg) enhanced the suppression of conditioned gaping, over that of either drug alone, without interfering with conditioned taste avoidance. MCP dose-dependently reduced nausea-induced conditioned gaping in rats. As well, the suppression of conditioned gaping was enhanced when ineffective doses of MCP and CBDA were coadministered. These data suggest that CBDA could be a powerful adjunct treatment to anti-emetic regimens for chemotherapy-induced nausea.
A comparison of cannabidiolic acid with other treatments for anticipatory nausea using a rat model of contextually elicited conditioned gaping.[Pubmed:24595502]
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Aug;231(16):3207-15.
RATIONALE: The effectiveness of Cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) was compared with other potential treatments for anticipatory nausea (AN), using a rat model of contextually elicited conditioned gaping reactions. OBJECTIVE: The potential of ondansetron (OND), Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), chlordiazepoxide (CDP), CBDA, and co-administration of CBDA and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) to reduce AN and modify locomotor activity was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following four pairings of a novel context with lithium chloride (LiCl), the rats were given a test for AN. On the test trial, they received pretreatment injections of the following: vehicle, OND (0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg), THC (0.5 mg/kg), CBDA (0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 mg/kg or 1.0 mg/kg), CDP (1, 5, or 10 mg/kg) or co-administration of subthreshold doses of CBDA (0.1 mug/kg), and THCA (5 mug/kg). Immediately following the AN test trial in all experiments, rats were given a 15 min locomotor activity test. Finally, the potential of CBDA (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mg/kg) to attenuate conditioned freezing to a shock-paired tone was assessed. RESULTS: THC, CBDA, and CDP, but not OND, reduced contextually elicited gaping reactions. Co-administration of subthreshold doses of CBDA and THCA also suppressed AN, and this effect was blocked by pretreatment with either a cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) receptor antagonist or a 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A (5-HT1A) receptor antagonist. CDP (but not CBDA, THC or CBDA and THCA) also suppressed locomotor activity at effective doses. CBDA did not modify the expression of conditioned fear. CONCLUSIONS: CBDA has therapeutic potential as a highly potent and selective treatment for AN without psychoactive or locomotor effects.
Down-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) by cannabidiolic acid in human breast cancer cells.[Pubmed:25242400]
J Toxicol Sci. 2014;39(5):711-6.
Metastases are known to be responsible for approximately 90% of breast cancer-related deaths. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is involved not only in inflammatory processes, but also in the metastasis of cancer cells; it is expressed in 40% of human invasive breast cancers. To comprehensively analyze the effects of Cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), a selective COX-2 inhibitor found in the fiber-type cannabis plant (Takeda et al., 2008), on COX-2 expression and the genes involved in metastasis, we performed a DNA microarray analysis of human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells, which are invasive breast cancer cells that express high levels of COX-2, treated with CBDA for 48 hr at 25 microM. The results obtained revealed that COX-2 and Id-1, a positive regulator of breast cancer metastasis, were down-regulated (0.19-fold and 0.52-fold, respectively), while SHARP1 (or BHLHE41), a suppressor of breast cancer metastasis, was up-regulated (1.72-fold) and CHIP (or STUB1) was unaffected (1.03-fold). These changes were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR analyses. Taken together, the results obtained here demonstrated that i) CBDA had dual inhibitory effects on COX-2 through down-regulation and enzyme inhibition, and ii) CBDA may possess the ability to suppress genes that are positively involved in the metastasis of cancer cells in vitro.